UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > The issue of triple talaq is in news recently...
Start Learning for Free
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:
I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.
II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.
III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.
II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.
III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.
Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
- a)Only I
- b)I and II
- c)II and III
- d)All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following ...
A Constitution Bench is set to hear the question whether triple talaq and polygamy violates the fundamental rights of Muslim women for which the Supreme Court said it has to examine if these personal law practices are the "fundamental traits" of the minority religion.
In this context, the Centre’s question as to “whether personal law is ‘law’ under Article 13 of the Constitution?” is significant. Article 13, for one, is so inclusive in its ambit that the term ‘law’ in the constitutional provision includes anything from an “ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification and even customs and usages” passed or made by the Legislature or any other “competent authority”.
The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13. The court had observed that reformation of personal laws is best left to the legislature as "chosen representatives of the people" and not the judiciary. It said the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions. It held that Article 44 (Uniform Civil Code) acquiesced the existence of varied personal laws. This 1951 judgment was never challenged in the Supreme Court.
In this context, the Centre’s question as to “whether personal law is ‘law’ under Article 13 of the Constitution?” is significant. Article 13, for one, is so inclusive in its ambit that the term ‘law’ in the constitutional provision includes anything from an “ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification and even customs and usages” passed or made by the Legislature or any other “competent authority”.
The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13. The court had observed that reformation of personal laws is best left to the legislature as "chosen representatives of the people" and not the judiciary. It said the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions. It held that Article 44 (Uniform Civil Code) acquiesced the existence of varied personal laws. This 1951 judgment was never challenged in the Supreme Court.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The issue of triple talaq is in news recently. Consider the following statements regarding constitutional provisions and recent judgments under Article 13:I. A judicial declaration from a Constitution Bench under Article 13 that personal laws are liable to comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution would bring religious law, even un-codified practices, under judicial review.II. The Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali had held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13.III. As per the one of the judgment said that the phrase ‘customs and usages’ in Article 13 does not include personal laws of various religions.Q. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only Ib)I and IIc)II and IIId)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup