In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > In addition to enhanced their reputations thr...

In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.

a)
of enhancing their reputation
b)
to having enhance their reputation
c)
to enhancing their reputation
d)
to have their reputation enhancing
e)
No correction required

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of phi...

In addition to enhancing their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.

Community Answer

In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of phi...

Explanation:

The sentence is discussing the reason why companies are sponsoring social initiatives. The correct option is "to enhancing their reputation."

Reasoning:

- The sentence is in the present continuous tense.
- The subject of the sentence is "companies," and the verb is "are sponsoring."
- The sentence is discussing the reason why companies are sponsoring social initiatives.
- The phrase "enhanced their reputations" is past tense and is not consistent with the present continuous tense of the sentence.
- Option (a) "of enhancing their reputation" is not grammatically correct.
- Option (b) "to having enhance their reputation" is also not grammatically correct.
- Option (d) "to have their reputation enhancing" is not grammatically correct.
- Option (e) "No correction required" is not the correct option because the sentence needs correction.

Therefore, the correct option is (c) "to enhancing their reputation."

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources. Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy. Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife. Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystemEven if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation.The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ. What is the main purpose of the author in writing the passage?

View answer

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources. Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy.Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife. Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystem. Even if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation. The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.According to the passage, which of the following developments is most likely if environmental cooperation between the federal government and state governments does not improve?

View answer

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources.Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy. Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife. Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystem.Even if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation. The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.The passage provides support for which of the following assertions?

View answer

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources. Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy. Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife. Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystem. Even if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation. The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions. Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the following Questions: In the context of the passage, the phrase external degradation (lines 8-9) refers to which of the following

View answer

To hit the nail right on the head

View answer

In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In addition to enhanced their reputations through strategic use of philanthropy, companies are sponsoring social initiatives to open new markets.a)of enhancing their reputationb)to having enhance their reputationc)to enhancing their reputationd)to have their reputation enhancinge)No correction requiredCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam