CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situatio... Start Learning for Free
Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.

Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.

Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.

A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.

Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.
  • a)
    This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old age
  • b)
    This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old father
  • c)
    This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or not
  • d)
    None of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions ...
It is clearly a case of undue influence' exercised by son and daughter-in-law, on the father, as they asked him to transfer all his property in their name, otherwise they will not feed him or give him shelter,
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions ...
Explanation:

Undue Influence:
- Undue influence occurs when one party is in a position to dominate the will of the other party.
- In this case, the son and daughter-in-law are in a position to dominate the will of the old father.

Coercion:
- Coercion involves committing or threatening to commit an act forbidden by law to force someone into an agreement.
- The threat of not providing food, shelter, or maintenance to the old father unless he transfers his property can be considered coercion.

Analysis:
- The son and daughter-in-law are exercising undue influence over the old father by threatening to withhold basic necessities unless he transfers his property to them.
- This situation falls under the definition of undue influence as per the principle provided.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
- This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old father.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Question Description
Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: A principle(s) and a fact situation are given in questions decide, only on the basis of the principles.Principle: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.Coercion: Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. When consent to a contract is caused by Coercion, then the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.Facts Raj was an old Hindu man of 65 when his son and daughter-in-law told him that until and unless he transfer all his property in their name, they won't feed him or give him shelter or maintain him in any other manner.a)This is a case of coercion since every Hindu is obligated to maintain his parents in old ageb)This is a case of undue influence exercised by the children over the old fatherc)This is a case of either coercion or undue influence since the adult son can decide whether he wants to maintain his rather or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev