UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > The East India Company forced many states int...
Start Learning for Free
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance
1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.
2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.
Which of the above is/are correct?
1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.
2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.
Which of the above is/are correct?
- a)1 only
- b)2 only
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary all...
Justification: Statement 1: Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces. But, they could keep forces within their Kingdom, so 1 is incorrect.
They were to be protected by the Company, but had to pay for the “subsidiary forces” that the Company was supposed to maintain for the purpose of this protection.
Statement 2: If the Indian rulers failed to make the payment, then part of their territory was taken away as penalty. It was not a mandatory clause. So, 2 is also wrong.
Learning: When Richard Wellesley was GovernorGeneral (1798-1805), the Nawab of Awadh was forced to
give over half of his territory to the Company in 1801, as he failed to pay for the “subsidiary forces”. Hyderabad
was also forced to cede territories on similar grounds.
Q Source: Page 111: Class 7th NCERT History: Our Pasts-II
They were to be protected by the Company, but had to pay for the “subsidiary forces” that the Company was supposed to maintain for the purpose of this protection.
Statement 2: If the Indian rulers failed to make the payment, then part of their territory was taken away as penalty. It was not a mandatory clause. So, 2 is also wrong.
Learning: When Richard Wellesley was GovernorGeneral (1798-1805), the Nawab of Awadh was forced to
give over half of his territory to the Company in 1801, as he failed to pay for the “subsidiary forces”. Hyderabad
was also forced to cede territories on similar grounds.
Q Source: Page 111: Class 7th NCERT History: Our Pasts-II
Most Upvoted Answer
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary all...
The correct answer is option 'D' - None.
Explanation:
The subsidiary alliance was a policy introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805, as a means to establish British control over Indian states without direct annexation. The policy aimed to subordinate Indian states to the British East India Company and ensure their dependence on the Company for protection and governance.
1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom: This statement is incorrect. Under the subsidiary alliance, Indian rulers were indeed allowed to keep armed forces in their kingdom, but they had to maintain a British-controlled contingent of troops, known as a subsidiary force, within their territory. These forces were meant to ensure the security and stability of the state and were under the command of British officers. The Indian ruler's own armed forces were not disbanded but were placed under British supervision.
2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument: This statement is also incorrect. The subsidiary alliance did not involve the transfer of land territory to the East India Company. However, the Indian states were required to pay for the maintenance of the subsidiary force stationed in their territory. If the Indian ruler failed to make the payments, the Company would deduct the amount from the state's revenue or assets. This arrangement ensured that the Indian states remained financially dependent on the Company.
In summary, neither of the statements mentioned in the question is correct. The subsidiary alliance did not prohibit Indian rulers from maintaining armed forces in their kingdom, and it did not involve the transfer of land territory to the East India Company. The policy aimed to establish British control and influence over Indian states by placing a subsidiary force within their territories and making them financially dependent on the Company.
Explanation:
The subsidiary alliance was a policy introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805, as a means to establish British control over Indian states without direct annexation. The policy aimed to subordinate Indian states to the British East India Company and ensure their dependence on the Company for protection and governance.
1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom: This statement is incorrect. Under the subsidiary alliance, Indian rulers were indeed allowed to keep armed forces in their kingdom, but they had to maintain a British-controlled contingent of troops, known as a subsidiary force, within their territory. These forces were meant to ensure the security and stability of the state and were under the command of British officers. The Indian ruler's own armed forces were not disbanded but were placed under British supervision.
2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument: This statement is also incorrect. The subsidiary alliance did not involve the transfer of land territory to the East India Company. However, the Indian states were required to pay for the maintenance of the subsidiary force stationed in their territory. If the Indian ruler failed to make the payments, the Company would deduct the amount from the state's revenue or assets. This arrangement ensured that the Indian states remained financially dependent on the Company.
In summary, neither of the statements mentioned in the question is correct. The subsidiary alliance did not prohibit Indian rulers from maintaining armed forces in their kingdom, and it did not involve the transfer of land territory to the East India Company. The policy aimed to establish British control and influence over Indian states by placing a subsidiary force within their territories and making them financially dependent on the Company.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The East India Company forced many states into a “subsidiary alliance”. According to the terms of this alliance1. No Indian ruler was allowed to keep armed forces in his kingdom.2. Half of the land territory of the states was to be transferred to the Company as a debt security instrument.Which of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup