Direction:In the question below are given two statements followed by t...
The least possible diagram of this question is as follows,
Conclusion I: All trucks are tata → As no cars are trucks and all tata are cars, no trucks will be tata, hence false.
Conclusion II: No tata are trucks → As no cars are trucks and all tata are cars, no trucks will be tata, hence true.
Hence, only conclusion II follows.
View all questions of this test
Direction:In the question below are given two statements followed by t...
The least possible diagram of this question is as follows,
Conclusion I: All trucks are tata → As no cars are trucks and all tata are cars, no trucks will be tata, hence false.
Conclusion II: No tata are trucks → As no cars are trucks and all tata are cars, no trucks will be tata, hence true.
Hence, only conclusion II follows.
Direction:In the question below are given two statements followed by t...
Given:
Statement I: No cars are trucks
Statement II: All tata are cars
To Find:
Which conclusion(s) logically follows from the given statements?
Solution:
To determine which conclusions logically follow from the given statements, we need to analyze the statements and check if the conclusions are supported by them.
Analysis:
From Statement I, we know that no cars are trucks. This means that there is no overlap between the set of cars and the set of trucks. In other words, there are no vehicles that are both cars and trucks.
From Statement II, we know that all Tata vehicles are cars. This means that every Tata vehicle belongs to the category of cars.
Conclusion I: All trucks are Tata
This conclusion cannot be logically derived from the given statements. Statement I clearly states that there is no overlap between the set of cars and the set of trucks. Therefore, we cannot conclude that all trucks are Tata vehicles, as some trucks may belong to other brands.
Conclusion II: No Tata are trucks
This conclusion can be logically derived from the given statements. Since no cars are trucks (Statement I) and all Tata vehicles are cars (Statement II), it follows that no Tata vehicles can be trucks. There is no overlap between the set of cars and the set of trucks, so no Tata vehicle can be a truck.
Therefore, only Conclusion II logically follows from the given statements.
Answer: Option B) Only conclusion II follows.