Question Description
Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the context and answer the following question.Indias record in promoting occupational and industrial safety remains weak even with years of robust economic growth. Making work environments safer is a low priority, although the productivity benefits of such investments have always been clear. The consequences are frequently seen in the form of a large number of fatalities and injuries, but in a market that has a steady supply of labour, policymakers tend to ignore the wider impact of such losses. There is not much evidence, of progressive moves. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2019, introduced in the Lok Sabha in July to combine 13 existing laws pays little attention to the sector-specific requirements of workers. One of its major shortcomings is that formation of safety committees and appointment of safety officers, the latter in the case of establishments with 500 workers, is left to the discretion of State governments.A safe work environment is a basic right, and Indias recent decades of high growth should have ushered in a framework of guarantees. Unfortunately, successive governments have not felt it necessary to ratify many fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Compromising on safety can lead to extreme consequences that go beyond factories and leave something that is etched in the nations memory as in the case of the Bhopal gas disaster.Q.Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?a)Several incidents in the last year have made it imperative for the government to abandon its current approach to the challenge.b)Government recognizes that safety and health of workers has a positive impact on productivity and economic and social development.c)A safe work environment is the basic right of every working man and woman in the nation.d)Industries that use hazardous processes and chemicals deserve particular attention, and limits of exposure for workers must be specified.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.