Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dra... Start Learning for Free
DIVA: OPERA
  • a)
    Producer: Theatre
  • b)
    Director: Drama
  • c)
    Conductor: Bus
  • d)
    Thespian: Play
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thesp...
Diva (woman singer) plays a leading role in an opera(musical play). Similarly, thespian(actor) plays a leading role in a play.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Verbal courses
Most Upvoted Answer
DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thesp...
Relationship between DIVA and OPERA:

- DIVA is a female opera singer
- OPERA is a type of musical theater that involves singing

Using this relationship, we can see that the correct answer is option D, Thespian : Play.

Explanation:

- Thespian refers to an actor or actress, just as DIVA refers to a female opera singer.
- Play is a type of theatrical production, just as OPERA is a type of musical theater.

Therefore, the relationship between Thespian and Play is similar to the relationship between DIVA and OPERA.
Community Answer
DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thesp...
Darma
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980sThe first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits. Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace.These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies. Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products. Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods. American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.Which of the following would most weaken the authors argument about the over-concentration on high technology products?

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980sThe first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace. These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies.Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products. Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods. American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.With which of the following general statements would the author most likely NOT agree?

DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIVA: OPERAa)Producer: Theatreb)Director: Dramac)Conductor: Busd)Thespian: PlayCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev