Mughal ruler under the control of wazir Imad-ul-Mulk

Introduction
The Mughal Empire was one of the largest and most powerful empires in Indian history. The Mughal rulers were known for their military prowess, their patronage of the arts, and their efforts to promote religious tolerance. However, towards the end of the empire, the power of the Mughal rulers began to decline, and they became puppets in the hands of their ministers.

The role of wazir Imad-ul-Mulk
Imad-ul-Mulk was a powerful wazir (minister) of the Mughal Empire during the reign of Alamgir II. He was appointed as the wazir in 1754 and remained in this position until 1757. During his tenure, he exercised tremendous power and influence over the Mughal ruler Alamgir II. In fact, Alamgir II was reduced to a puppet ruler who only acted on the advice of his wazir.

Alamgir II
Alamgir II was the son of Mughal Emperor Jahandar Shah. He became the Mughal Emperor in 1754 after deposing his predecessor Ahmad Shah Bahadur. However, Alamgir II was not a strong ruler and was easily influenced by his ministers, especially Imad-ul-Mulk. Under the influence of Imad-ul-Mulk, Alamgir II made a number of decisions that were detrimental to the interests of the Mughal Empire.

The decline of the Mughal Empire
The decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by a number of factors, including the weakening of central authority, the rise of regional powers, and the increasing influence of European powers. However, one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire was the puppetry of the Mughal rulers. The Mughal rulers were no longer independent and were controlled by their ministers, who were often corrupt and self-serving.

Conclusion
Imad-ul-Mulk was one of the most powerful ministers of the Mughal Empire and was responsible for reducing the Mughal ruler Alamgir II to a puppet. This puppetry of the Mughal rulers was one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire. Today, the Mughal Empire is remembered for its architecture, art, and culture, but its decline serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of weak leadership.