All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kai... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law?
Clear all your Verbal doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. Y...
39,Kailash colony
New Delhi-110001
August 25,2020

Commissioner of police
New Delhi branch
New Delhi
Sub: Complaint Letter against Child Labor

Respected Sir,

I am writing this letter to you so that I can tell you about child labour. Few tea stalls near to our Kailash colony is hiring children to work as a labour in their stalls. As I was passing by one of the tea stall, I have seen two-four children at stalls taking and bringing the orders. I have asked one of them, the kid told me that they don't have enough income to maintain the whole family. In order to make some money they work in the stall. The child also told that they earn a small money which even can't afford them to go to any government school. The children were also beaten by their master. I felt pity on him so I gave him a 100 rupee note. He was happy on getting the money. Some childrens were also begging at the intersections.

That scenario disturbed me a lot. So I want you to take action against them because children are of 9-13 years old. And also the persons or the masters are breaking the laws prohibiting the child labour. Also this is not the way to hire such young children and make them work in a tea stall and steal their childhood and education from them.

Please take strict action against them as soon as possible. Thanks,

Regards,
Shalini
(public resident)
Community Answer
You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. Y...
Letter to Commissioner Delhi Police regarding Child Labour

Dear Sir/Madam,

I, Shalini/Shashank, a concerned citizen residing at 39, Kailash Colony, New Delhi, am writing this letter to draw your attention towards the increasing number of child labour cases in our city. It is disheartening to see children working in tea stalls, begging at intersections, and performing other hazardous jobs, despite laws prohibiting child labour.

I strongly believe that every child has the right to education and a healthy childhood, free from any kind of exploitation or abuse. However, the reality in our city is far from it. Many children are deprived of their basic rights and are forced to work to earn a living, which adversely affects their physical and mental growth.

Therefore, I request you to take strict action against those who employ children for work and those who exploit them for begging or other illegal activities. It is the responsibility of the law enforcement agencies to ensure that the laws prohibiting child labour are implemented effectively.

I urge you to take immediate action to protect the children and bring the perpetrators to justice. Let us work together to create a safe and secure environment for our children.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q. Which of the following assertions would most strengthen the authors claim that deterrence will not work on corporations?

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a company‘s aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the company‘s practice organize a highly effective boycott of the company‘s products, their moral views will soon enter into the company‘s deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly. If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q. If a company that produced shampoo products opted to stop the routine testing of its products on animals because it decided that it is wrong to cause the animals pain, what effect would this have on the argument made in the passage?

You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law?
Question Description
You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? for Verbal 2024 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law?.
Solutions for You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law?, a detailed solution for You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? has been provided alongside types of You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice You are Shalini / Shashank living at  39,Kailash Colony, New Delhi. You  have noticed that children are working in tea stalls, begging at intersections  etc in spite of laws prohibiting child  labour. Write a letter in 100-120  words to the Commissioner Delhi  Police, showing your concern about it  and requesting strict implementation  of law? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup