Which one of the following scholars suggests the Earth's origin form g...
Earth's Origin from Gases and Dust Particles
O Schmidt is the scholar who suggests that the Earth's origin is from gases and dust particles. His theory is known as the Nebular Hypothesis, which suggests that the solar system formed from a rotating cloud of gas and dust.
Evidence for Nebular Hypothesis
There are several pieces of evidence that support the Nebular Hypothesis, including:
1. Composition of the Solar System: The composition of the solar system is consistent with the Nebular Hypothesis. The inner planets are made up of dense, rocky materials, while the outer planets are composed of lighter gases and ice.
2. Orbit of the Planets: The orbits of the planets are also consistent with the Nebular Hypothesis, as they all orbit in the same direction around the sun and in the same plane.
3. Formation of Moons: The formation of moons around the planets is also consistent with the Nebular Hypothesis, as it suggests that moons are formed from the same material that forms the planets.
4. Presence of Asteroids and Comets: The presence of asteroids and comets in the solar system is also consistent with the Nebular Hypothesis, as they are believed to be remnants of the original cloud of gas and dust.
Conclusion
In conclusion, O Schmidt's Nebular Hypothesis suggests that the Earth's origin is from gases and dust particles, and this theory is supported by several pieces of evidence.
Which one of the following scholars suggests the Earth's origin form g...
¶¶¶¶(Correct Option:- D) (Otto Schmidt suggests the earth's origin is from gases and dust particles. O. Schmidt in 1943 gave Inter-Slellar Dust Hypothesis for the origin of the earth and solar system).¶¶¶¶
A large number of hypotheses were put forth
by different philosophers and scientists
regarding the origin of the earth. One of the
earlier and popular arguments was by German
philosopher Immanuel Kant. Mathematician
Laplace revised it in 1796. It is known as
Nebular Hypothesis. The hypothesis considered
that the planets were formed out of a cloud of
material associated with a youthful sun, which
was slowly rotating. Later in 1900, Chamberlain
and Moulton considered that a wandering star
approached the sun. As a result, a cigar-shaped
extension of material was separated from the
solar surface. As the passing star moved away,
the material separated from the solar surface
continued to revolve around the sun and it
slowly condensed into planets. Sir James Jeans
and later Sir Harold Jeffrey supported this
argument. At a later date, the arguments
considered of a companion to the sun to have
been coexisting. These arguments are called
binary theories. In 1950, Otto Schmidt in
Russia and Carl Weizascar in Germany
somewhat revised the ‘nebular hypothesis’,
though differing in details. They considered that
the sun was surrounded by solar nebula
containing mostly the hydrogen and helium
along with what may be termed as dust. The
friction and collision of particles led to formation
of a disk-shaped cloud and the planets were
formed through the process of accretion.
However, scientists in later period took up
the problems of origin of universe rather than
that of just the earth or the planets.