The correct answer is option 'B' - Berubari Case, 1960.

Explanation:

The Berubari Case of 1960 was a landmark judgement by the Supreme Court of India that dealt with the question of the constitutional status of the Preamble. The case arose out of a dispute between India and Pakistan over the ownership of the Berubari Union of West Bengal.

The Indian government sought to transfer the Berubari Union to Pakistan under the Nehru-Noon Agreement of 1958. However, the transfer required an amendment to the Indian Constitution, which would have affected the territorial integrity of India. The amendment was challenged in the Supreme Court on the grounds that it violated the basic structure of the Constitution.

In its verdict, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble was not a part of the Constitution and therefore, it could be amended without affecting the basic structure of the Constitution. The court held that the Preamble was a mere introductory statement and did not confer any rights or impose any obligations.

The court observed that the Preamble was not a source of power or an instrument of limitation, but merely a key to understanding the Constitution. The court also held that the Preamble was not enforceable in a court of law and did not confer any justiciable rights.

This judgement had far-reaching implications for the interpretation of the Indian Constitution. It established the principle that the Preamble was not a part of the Constitution and therefore, it could be amended without affecting the basic structure of the Constitution. However, this view has been challenged in subsequent judgements, such as the Kesavananda Bharati case of 1973, which held that the Preamble was a part of the Constitution and formed an integral part of its basic structure.