Question Description
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.What can be inferred from the petitioners first argument?a)Google may not have asked for an consent before accessing individuals data.b)The citizens will have no problem in sharing their data with the government if its purpose is stated.c)The citizens may have had to share their data with the government through Aadhar against their will.d)The government has made us of citizens personal data for unwarranted purposes.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.