CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions for questions: Each set of questi... Start Learning for Free
Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.
In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.
Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?
Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.
Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.
Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?
Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.
Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."
  • a)
    It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.
  • b)
    It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.
  • c)
    It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.
  • d)
    It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is ba...
Concession is a device used in arguments, where you agree with your opponent, before making your own point. This sentence precisely serves that purpose. It is an agreement before countering the court's argument with the assertion that the extent of sharing data needs to be pondered upon. (a) is incomplete. The sentence doesn't stray away from the topic. So (b) goes away. (d) doesn't cover the counter that has been raised by the petitioner.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is ba...
Understanding the Role of the Sentence
The sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world" serves a strategic purpose in the context of the dialogue between the petitioner and the court.
Concession to the Court
- The petitioner acknowledges the reality of the current digital landscape.
- This concession indicates that the petitioner is not dismissing the court's observation but is instead recognizing its validity.
Highlighting Limitations
- Following this concession, the petitioner pivots the conversation towards a critical point.
- By agreeing to the court's premise, the petitioner positions themselves to highlight potential concerns regarding the extent of data sharing, particularly by the state.
Framing the Argument
- The sentence effectively sets the stage for the petitioner to argue that while data sharing may be commonplace, there are ethical and privacy concerns specific to state involvement.
- This establishes a contrast between voluntary data sharing with private entities and compelled data sharing with the government.
Conclusion
The sentence acts as a bridge in the argument, allowing the petitioner to acknowledge the court's point while simultaneously raising concerns about the implications of state data usage. This strategic move emphasizes the need for clear boundaries and regulations concerning personal data in a networked world, thus justifying why the court needs to evaluate the extent of information sought by the state.
Overall, option 'C' captures the essence of this role, highlighting the balance between acknowledgment and the need for scrutiny in data privacy issues.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. Given below are two statements:A. Private entities have destroyed any unnecessary personal data collected and have progressively reduced the collection and use of an individual's data.B. The government has released a document clarifying the purpose for which the citizen's personal data will be used by it.What purpose do these statements serve?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions for questions: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you.In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data.Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Q. What is the role played by the sentence "I agree that we live in a networked world."a)It shows acknowledgement of, and agreement with the court's argument.b)It strays away from the point being discussed before making a forceful argument.c)It is a concession granted to the court before highlighting where its argument is lacking.d)It is an acknowledgement of the court's argument before the matter is left in the court's hands.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev