Question Description
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?a)The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prime ministers remarks were accurately reported.b)Newspapers ought not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.c)If the newspapers rendering of the prime ministers remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.d)If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime ministers remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.