CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: In the following questions, a st... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.
Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.
II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.
  • a)
    if conclusion I follows;
  • b)
    if conclusion II follows;
  • c)
    if both I and II follow;
  • d)
    if either I or II follows; and
  • e)
    if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are follow...
Both conclusions are correct. Killing continues, means the first conclusion is valid. Killing continues while the government says that terrorists are in check, means that the second is valid.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are follow...
Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.
Conclusions:
I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.
II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.

Explanation:
To evaluate the given conclusions, let's analyze the statement and each conclusion separately.

Analysis of the Statement:
The statement suggests that despite the government's claim that terrorism is under control, killings are still taking place. This indicates a discrepancy between the government's assertion and the ground reality.

Analysis of Conclusion I:
Conclusion I states that the terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government. This conclusion can be inferred from the statement since the continuation of killings implies that the terrorists have not ceased their activities or reached any agreement with the government. Therefore, Conclusion I follows logically from the given statement.

Analysis of Conclusion II:
Conclusion II suggests that the government has been constantly lying about the situation of terrorism. This conclusion is not directly supported by the given statement. While the statement highlights the contradiction between the government's claim and the ongoing killings, it does not explicitly state that the government is lying. Therefore, Conclusion II cannot be logically deduced from the given statement.

Conclusion:
Based on the analysis above, we can conclude that:
- Conclusion I follows logically from the given statement.
- Conclusion II does not follow logically from the given statement.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - if both I and II follow.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.Conclusions: I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.a) if conclusion I follows;b) if conclusion II follows;c) if both I and II follow;d) if either I or II follows; ande) if neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev