Question Description
Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: Any direct physical interference with someone’s possession of goods without any lawful justification constitutes the tort of trespass to goods.Facts:Amol was sitting in his lawn with some stolen books by J.K. Rowling. Suddenly, his neighbour, Ahaana, entered and tried to snatch away those books from him saying that they belong to her. As it turns out, she was right. Still, Amol sues Ahaana for trespass to goods. Will he succeed?a)Yes, Ahaana is liable for trespass to goods.b)Yes, because Ahaana shouldn’t snatch things just like that.c)No, because Ahaana was the rightful owner of the books.d)No, because the books do not belong to Amol, and no matter who they belong to, Amol cannot sue.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.