Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction:Choose the correct alternative, ke...

Direction:

Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:

Question:

Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.

Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.

a)
B is liable for trespass.
b)
B is liable for negligence.
c)
B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.
d)
B is not liable because there is no injury.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the princip...

There is damage but no injury. Hence (d).

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Questions 4 - 6are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Que: Had Aggubai clearly instructed Annubai totravel only by train, who would then beliable for the accident?

View answer

Directions: Questions 4 - 6 are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Q.Did Annubai and Aggubai have a principalagent relationship?

View answer

Directions: Questions 4 - 6are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowells No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Que: On her way back, Annubai decided to drivedown for a part of the journey as her friendBhavinder told her it was a scenic drive.Annubai got tempted and downed 4 bottlesof whisky in the car. Owing to herinebriated state, Annubai sped and her carran into a family of three sleeping on thefootpath. Who will be liable for theaccident?

View answer

This Questions based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control and direction must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongful manner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have been performed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can be completely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Q.On her way back, Annubai decided to drive down for a part of the journey as her friend Bhavinder told her it was a scenic drive. Annubai got tempted and downed 4 bottles of whisky in the car. Owing to her inebriated state, Annubai sped and her car ran into a family of three sleeping on the footpath. Who will be liable for the accident?

View answer

This Questions based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control and direction must be complied with. Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongful manner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act. Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have been performed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can be completely divorced from the authorized act. Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowells No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Q.Did Annubai and Aggubai have a principal agent relationship?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction:Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:Question:Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law.Facts: A had a house which received sunlight for most part of the day. B constructed a building right beside A's house such that the sunlight reaching A's house was obstructed for four hours per day. A sued B. Decide.a)B is liable for trespass.b)B is liable for negligence.c)B is not liable because the objection from A should have come when the building plans were approved, not after the building has been constructed.d)B is not liable because there is no injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam