Question Description
"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?a)The sale of the cars has decreased substantially, due to availability of the Cabs, but the traffic remains the same.b)The Job vacancies for professors were almost double this time, but the number of qualified applications was more or less the same.c)The number of mobile game applications has increased and the diseases caused by staring at mobile has substantially decreased.d)The trains connecting Delhi and Mumbai have doubled in the last 20 years, but still more trains are needed.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.