CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   "India’s food policy has focused on cereals ... Start Learning for Free
"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.
The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.
While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.
How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?
The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.
Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals?
  • a)
    Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.
  • b)
    Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.
  • c)
    All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.
  • d)
    All the above.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolutio...
The author has shown concerns regarding the outcome of selling vegetables at MSP. And neighbouring countries cannot practically be approached for the job of storage. Hence, establishing advanced storage units is a viable solution.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following examples best demonstrate the effect as demonstrated in the statement “While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not”?

"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following cannot be inferred from the statement “While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket”?

"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following statements, if true, strengthens the statement “Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide”?

"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. What role does the statement “This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals” play for the statement “When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate”?

Passage:The rapid and unprecedented changes in the external environment such as liberalization of the economy, globalization of international markets, and deregulation of the financial system and implications of various clauses under WTO exerted considerable pressure on the agricultural system. The inadequate levels of capital formation in the agricultural sector, distancing of farm technologies from requirements of the market, inadequate and untimely supply of credit and post-harvest losses are the worrying factors. Agricultural sector employs about 64% of the workforce, contributes 27.4% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and accounts for about 18% share of the value of the country‘s exports. It supplies bulk of wage goods required by non-agricultural sector and raw material for a large section of the industry. In terms of gross fertilizer consumption, India ranks 4th in the world after USA, Russia and China. The country has the largest area in the world under pulse crops while in the field of cotton; India is the first to evolve a cotton hybrid. In 1996-97, the per capital net availability of foodgrains touched 528.77gms, which was a mere 395gms at the time of India‘s independence. Therefore, it has a vital place in the economic development of the country. Significant strides have been made in agricultural production towards ensuring food security. There has been a significant improvement in agriculturalproductivity which has helped in reducing rural poverty. The trend in the growth of foodgrain production, particularly in high productivity areas like Haryana and Punjab, is on the decline. Agricultural productivity in the Eastern region, excepting West Bengal, is low, and it is mainly attributed to weak infrastructure. Indian agriculture is also on the threshold of becoming globally competitive and is in a position to make major gains in the export market. Foodgrains account for 63% of country‘s agricultural output and hence even a marginal production has ‘ripple effect‘on the rest of the economy. IN 1997, the foodgrains output was 199 million tones but in 1998 it was lowered by over 4 million tones owing to a fall in the pulse production. Initiatives for increasing the production and productivity of cereal crops on the basis of cropping systems approach continued during the year 1996-97. In 1997-98, 31.2 million tones of coarse cereals were produced. However, barring the record production of 69.3 million tonnes of wheat in 1996-97, the production of wheat at 66.5 million tonnes in 1997-98 and expected rice production at 83.5 million tones is said to be the highest ever. Procurement of wheat during the rabbi marketing season 1998-99 touched a record high of 10.61 million tonnes. Pulses production in the country has been stagnating around 8-14 million tonnes for the last 40 years. The production of pulses is expected to be about 13 million tonnes in 1997-98 compared to 13.19 million tonnes during 1995-96. The adverse agro-climatic conditions have had their impact on the production of commercial crops. The production of 9 major oilseeds in 1997-98 is expected to be 24 million tonnes, as compared to 25 million tonnes in 1996-97 and 22.4 million tonnes in ‘95-96. Among the nine oilseed crops grown in the country, groundnut and rasped/mustard together account for 62% of the total oilseeds production. The production of groundnut and rapeseed and mustard is expected to touch 8 million and 6 million tonnes compared to 9 million and 7 million tonnes in 1996-97.Q.What, according to the passage, is the ‘RIPPLE EFFECT‘?

Top Courses for CLAT

"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
"India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "India’s food policy has focused on cereals since the Green Revolution in the mid-1960s. But today, Indian food consumption baskets have changed significantly. Yet, agricultural policy continues to favour cereals, and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buys millions of tons of wheat and rice at minimum support prices (MSP). As a consequence, farmers prefer to produce cereals. This has meant more than adequate supply. It is not a surprise that the prices of cereals have remained stable, while the prices of vegetables see wild swings.The supply of vegetables, milk and pulses in the country has not risen as it should have. Farmers need price stability, which vegetables can’t provide. Vegetable prices are volatile. When prices are high and farmers produce a vegetable, then lots of them do so, and there is oversupply, leading to a crash in prices. The whiplash in prices results in low farmer incomes. When prices are high, output is low, and so, income is inadequate. When output is high, prices crash, and therefore, income is inadequate. This makes vegetables less attractive than cereals. While the policy framework makes cereals attractive for an individual farmer, for the country as a whole, it is not the appropriate production basket. Spending lakhs of crores on cereal production through input subsidies, on procurement and then on storage, does not make sense any more.While production of cereals has been rising, consumption has not. This has resulted in a rise in food grains stored. As of July 2019, a total of 744 lakh tonnes of foodgrain stocks were stored in godowns, open plinths and silos. India needs to hold, according to the buffer stock norm, only 411 lakh tonnes.How can the country stop over-producing cereals and divert resources to other food items that people want to consume?The solution lies in both infrastructure and regulatory changes that wean the system away from cereals and allow a more diversified food basket to be produced. Vegetables, milk, meat, fish, eggs are more perishable. They require more infrastructural facilities like roads, cold storage chains, and access to markets.Q. Which of the following could be the solution, as suggested by the author, for stopping the over-production of cereals? a)Neighbouring countries should be approached for providing empty storage-units to help in the storage of the Cereals and vegetables.b)Advanced cold storage units may be established near the markets, to increase the shelf life of vegetables.c)All the vegetables should also be allowed to be sold at MSP, regardless of what effect it puts on the financial planning.d)All the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev