Who argued that ‘Oriental learning was completely inferior to Eu...
Lord Curzon argued that Oriental learning was completely inferior to European learning.
Explanation:
Lord Curzon was the Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905. He was a firm believer in the superiority of European culture and education over Oriental culture and education. He believed that the British had a civilizing mission in India, and one of their main tasks was to introduce European education and culture to the people of India.
Lord Curzon’s views on Oriental learning were influenced by the ideas of British Orientalists, who believed that Oriental learning was inferior to European learning. According to them, Oriental languages and literature, including Sanskrit and Arabic, were dead languages that had no relevance to the modern world. They believed that European languages and literature, especially English, were the key to modernization and progress.
Lord Curzon was also critical of the traditional Indian education system, which he believed was outdated and inadequate. He argued that Indian education focused too much on religious and philosophical subjects and neglected practical subjects that were essential for modern life, such as science and technology.
To promote European education in India, Lord Curzon introduced a number of reforms, including the establishment of universities and colleges that followed the British model of education. He also promoted the teaching of English as the medium of instruction in schools and colleges.
In conclusion, Lord Curzon was a strong advocate of European education and culture, and he believed that Oriental learning was completely inferior to European learning. His views were influenced by the ideas of British Orientalists, who believed that European education was the key to modernization and progress.
Who argued that ‘Oriental learning was completely inferior to Eu...
Macaulay is the correct answer