Introduction:
The question of separate electorates was a highly controversial issue during the Indian independence movement. It created a lot of division and led to political leaders being shamed for their stance on the issue.

The issue of separate electorates:
Separate electorates were a system where different religious communities were given separate representation in the legislative bodies. This system was introduced by the British in India to give representation to minority communities who felt marginalized under the British rule. However, this system created a divide among different communities and led to communal tensions.

The stance of political leaders:
Different political leaders had different views on the issue of separate electorates. Some leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were against the system as they believed it would perpetuate communal tensions and lead to the division of the country. They argued for a unified India where all communities would have equal representation.

On the other hand, leaders like Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the Muslim League were in favor of separate electorates for Muslims. They believed that Muslims needed separate representation to protect their rights and interests.

The shaming of political leaders:
The issue of separate electorates became a highly emotional and divisive issue. Political leaders who took a stance against the prevailing sentiment were often shamed and criticized by their opponents. Mahatma Gandhi was accused of betraying the Muslim community by opposing separate electorates. He was also criticized for his willingness to compromise with the British.

Similarly, Jinnah was accused of promoting communalism and dividing the country. He was shamed for his insistence on separate electorates for Muslims and was seen as a divisive figure.

Conclusion:
The issue of separate electorates was a highly emotional and divisive issue during the Indian independence movement. Political leaders who took a stance on the issue were often shamed and criticized by their opponents. However, the eventual outcome of the movement was a unified India where all communities had equal representation.