*Dlits participation is limited in civil disobediece movement becoz at that time untouchability touching its heights.

*Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar demand for seperate nation of dalits.As dalits in India are unfavoured.

*One related reason is that also ,if dalits participate in the than it led to decreasing the participation of other castes due to untouchability.




hope it will help u
:)

Introduction:
The Civil Disobedience Movement was a significant movement led by Mahatma Gandhi against British rule in India. It aimed to challenge the unjust laws imposed by the British government and attain independence through nonviolent means. However, Dalit participation in this movement was limited for various reasons.

Social Discrimination:
1. Caste-based Discrimination: Dalits, also known as untouchables, faced severe discrimination in Indian society due to their low social status. They were considered impure and were subjected to various forms of social, economic, and political oppression.
2. Lack of Awareness: Many Dalits were unaware of the ongoing political movements and their significance. Illiteracy and limited access to education further hindered their understanding and participation in the Civil Disobedience Movement.
3. Exclusion from Leadership: Dalits were often excluded from leadership positions within the Indian National Congress and other political organizations. Their voices and concerns were not adequately represented, which further marginalized their participation in the movement.

Opposition from Upper Castes:
1. Resistance from Upper Castes: The upper-caste elites, who held dominant positions in society, often opposed Dalit participation in political movements. They feared losing their privileged status and perpetuated caste-based discrimination to maintain control.
2. Limited Access to Resources: Dalits faced economic challenges and lacked access to resources such as land, education, and political networks. This limited their ability to actively participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement.

Inadequate Representation and Recognition:
1. Lack of Dalit Leaders: The Civil Disobedience Movement largely lacked Dalit leaders who could mobilize and organize the Dalit community effectively. The absence of prominent Dalit figures hindered their active participation.
2. Limited Recognition of Dalit Issues: The movement primarily focused on broader issues such as independence and swaraj (self-rule), neglecting the specific concerns and grievances of the Dalit community. This lack of recognition further marginalized their participation.

Conclusion:
Although the Civil Disobedience Movement aimed to unite Indians against British rule, Dalit participation was limited due to social discrimination, opposition from upper castes, and inadequate representation. Overcoming these challenges required a broader social transformation and inclusive leadership that recognized and addressed the specific needs of the Dalit community.