Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In this question, one or more pr...

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.

Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.

Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.

Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?

a)
No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.
b)
No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.
c)
No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.
d)
No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given follow...

As per the strict application of the given principle, this will be the right choice.

She did not know that the person she was treating was an enemy. Therefore, she cannot be held liable for harboring or protecting an enemy.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.2. No person shall be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.Facts: A minor had been punished for an offence for 14 years. While he was serving the sentence for imprisonment, a new law was made, containing provision that no minor could be put in jail for more than 10 years. He appealed before the court to be protected under the amended provision for the same.

View answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: If a person, without any authority, prevents a person to proceed to any direction and is kept confined, he commits an offence of criminal confinement.Facts: The Municipal Board allowed X to hold a marriage party by blocking a part of a public road. The marriage party blocked most of the road and did not allow A, a passerby, to cross the road. He brought a charge of criminal confinement against the head of the marriage party and other associates.Can A succeed?

View answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: A surety is discharged if the creditor and the principal debtor vary the terms of the contract without his consent.Facts: Vikash agrees to act as a guarantor for Shubham's employment as a clerk to Shivani. Later, Shubham was promoted as a financial head by Shivani. One day, Shubham stole money and left the country. Shivani decided to sue Vikash.Decide his liability.

View answer

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.

View answer

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Whoever knowingly harbours or protects an enemy shall be punished with death.Facts: Sakshi, a doctor treats a wounded man and makes him well. Later, it emerges that the wounded man was actually an enemy General.Q. Is the sentence of death appropriate in this case?a)No, because death penalty has been abolished in India.b)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.c)No, because death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of cases and this penalty is too harsh in this case.d)No, because Sakshi did not know that she was treating an enemy.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam