CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly... Start Learning for Free
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.
Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.
  • a)
    Y can be prosecuted for theft
  • b)
    Y cannot be prosecuted for theft
  • c)
    Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theft
  • d)
    Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theft
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable propert...
Y has committed theft.
As soon as Y severed tree belonging to Z from Z's land the tree became subject of theft. As soon as Y did an act to take away a property belonging to Z from his possession he has committed theft. Actual taking away of the property is not a necessary and mere change in property with the intention of taking it away is theft.
therefore, even though Y is yet to take the tree out of Z's possession he has committed theft as soon as he severed the tree from Z's land.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property with an intention to take it, is said to commit theft.Facts: Y cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Y could not take away the tree.a)Y can be prosecuted for theftb)Y cannot be prosecuted for theftc)Y can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)Y has neither committed theft nor attempted to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev