All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The fewer restrictions there are on the adver... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?
  • a)
    The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.
  • b)
    The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.
  • c)
    Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.
  • d)
    Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.
  • e)
    Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services,...

Explanation:

Unpacking the Argument:

The argument states that fewer restrictions on advertising legal services lead to more lawyers advertising their services, resulting in lower prices for those services. It concludes that overall consumer legal costs will be lower if the state removes certain restrictions.

Weakening Assertion:

Option B: The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.

- This option suggests that the state may not completely eliminate restrictions on advertising legal services, which could limit the extent to which more lawyers advertise their services.
- If not all restrictions are removed, the increase in advertising and subsequent price reduction may not be as significant as the argument assumes.
- This information weakens the argument by casting doubt on the premise that removing restrictions will lead to substantially lower consumer legal costs.

Therefore, option B is the most significant in weakening the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services,...
If E is true, the lawyers who begin advertising when the restriction is removed might all be among those who do not lower their fees on beginning to advertise, in which case no decrease in consumer legal costs will occur. Therefore, E weakens the argument and is the best answer. Since A does not relate the recent removal of restrictions to changes in consumer legal costs, it alone does not weaken the argument. Since the argument is unconcerned with whatever restrictions remain in effect but focuses only on those that will be removed, B does not weaken the argument. C and D are irrelevant to an evaluation of the argument, which is concerned with cost considerations, not with the quality of legal services or the content of lawyers' advertisements.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

As Internet marketing has matured, it has driven two trends: a narrower focus on pitching specific consumer groups and a more robust effort to measure the outcomes of marketing campaigns. In the pre-Internet world, advertisers were content to pay for television commercials whose audience was relatively broad and whose effect was not easily quantifiable. While a company might use viewership ratings to get general data about the size and demographics of the audience for its commercials, there was no way to measure the extent to which these commercials translated into actual sales.In contrast, many companies are now moving their marketing dollars away from traditional advertising outlets towards Internet-based campaigns that can target specific consumer groups and quantify the return on marketing investments. For example, pay-per-click search engines allow companies to pay for small text advertisements that are displayed only when users search for specific words relevant to the products and services sold by that company.A company is charged only when a consumer clicks on the ad and is directed to the company’s website, thereby ensuring that the company’s advertising dollars are spent capturing consumers that demonstrate some interest in its offerings. Further, using sophisticated web-analytic technology, companies can track a consumer’s online behavior and determine the exact amount of any online purchases made.Though hailed as more cost-effective, Internet advertising has its limits. Proponents of print media argue that newspaper ads more effectively promote brand awareness and thereby provide better value. Further, fraud, intense competition, and the rise of ancillary services—such as firms that companies must hire to navigate complex webtracking tools—render Internet marketing more costly than some companies realize.Q.The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup