UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thom...
Start Learning for Free
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related to
- a)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition
- b)National Judicial Appointments Commission
- c)Disqualification of Member of Parliament
- d)Right to life under Article 21
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case ...
- As per Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951, conviction of a lawmaker for an offence with a two-year sentence or more leads to disqualification from the House.
- Section 8(4) of the RPA said that the disqualification takes effect only “after three months have elapsed” from the date of conviction. Within that period, the convicted lawmaker could have filed an appeal against the sentence before a higher court.
- However, this provision was struck down as “unconstitutional” in the Supreme Court’s landmark 2013 ruling in ‘Lily Thomas v Union of India’.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case ...
Disqualification of Member of Parliament:
The Supreme Court's ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related to the disqualification of Member of Parliament under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The case revolved around Section 8(4) of the Act which allowed convicted lawmakers to continue in office if an appeal against their conviction was pending.
Background:
Lily Thomas, a senior advocate, filed a petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act. She argued that allowing convicted lawmakers to continue in office created a loophole for criminals to hold public office and undermined the integrity of the legislative body.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, struck down Section 8(4) of the Act, thereby disqualifying convicted lawmakers from holding office even if they had filed an appeal against their conviction. The Court held that allowing convicted individuals to continue as lawmakers was against the principles of democracy and good governance.
Impact:
The ruling in the Lily Thomas case had a significant impact on Indian politics as it raised the bar for the integrity of public representatives. It set a precedent for holding lawmakers accountable for their actions and ensuring that individuals with criminal backgrounds were not allowed to hold public office.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case was a landmark judgment that strengthened the principles of democracy and accountability in the Indian political system.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related to the disqualification of Member of Parliament under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The case revolved around Section 8(4) of the Act which allowed convicted lawmakers to continue in office if an appeal against their conviction was pending.
Background:
Lily Thomas, a senior advocate, filed a petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act. She argued that allowing convicted lawmakers to continue in office created a loophole for criminals to hold public office and undermined the integrity of the legislative body.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, struck down Section 8(4) of the Act, thereby disqualifying convicted lawmakers from holding office even if they had filed an appeal against their conviction. The Court held that allowing convicted individuals to continue as lawmakers was against the principles of democracy and good governance.
Impact:
The ruling in the Lily Thomas case had a significant impact on Indian politics as it raised the bar for the integrity of public representatives. It set a precedent for holding lawmakers accountable for their actions and ensuring that individuals with criminal backgrounds were not allowed to hold public office.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case was a landmark judgment that strengthened the principles of democracy and accountability in the Indian political system.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The Supreme Court’s ruling in Lily Thomas v Union of India case is related toa)Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitionb)National Judicial Appointments Commissionc)Disqualification of Member of Parliamentd)Right to life under Article 21Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup