Consider the following pairs: 1. Sindhias. - Indore2. Gaekwad. - Baro...
Understanding the Pairs
To evaluate which pairs are correctly matched, we need to analyze the associations of the given dynasties with their respective regions.
1. Sindhias - Indore
- The Sindhias were indeed rulers of Indore, which was part of the former state of Gwalior in Central India.
- This pair is correctly matched.
2. Gaekwad - Baroda
- The Gaekwad dynasty ruled Baroda (now Vadodara) in Gujarat.
- This association is also correct.
3. Bhonsle - Nagpur
- The Bhonsle dynasty was associated with Nagpur and was prominent in the region of Maharashtra.
- This pairing is correct as well.
Conclusion
All the pairs mentioned are correctly matched. However, the question indicates that option 'A' is the correct answer, implying that the first pair (Sindhias - Indore) is not correctly matched.
This is misleading because, based on historical records, the Sindhias were indeed associated with Indore.
Final Answer
- Therefore, the statement that the first pair is incorrectly matched is inaccurate.
- The correct answer is that all pairs are matched correctly, making "None of the above" a more accurate choice.
In summary, it appears that option 'A' is not correct since all pairs are validated to be accurate.
Consider the following pairs: 1. Sindhias. - Indore2. Gaekwad. - Baro...
Indore was under control of Holkars. Maratha chiefs (sardars) like Sindhia of Gwalior, Gaekwad of Baroda and Bhonsle of Nagpur had the resources to raise powerful armies.