Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucksandrsquo; rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the governmentandrsquo;s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucksandrsquo; rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Light utility trucks have become popular amon...

Join the Discussion on the App

The argument depends on the assumption that

a)
the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucks
b)
people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklessly
c)
light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuries
d)
the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerful
e)
light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standards

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them ...

The argument presented suggests that drivers of light utility trucks are more likely to be injured in a high-impact accident compared to drivers of cars subject to government car-safety standards. To maintain its logical structure, the argument relies on an underlying assumption. Let's evaluate each option:

(A) the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucks. This option is not necessary for the argument because the argument is concerned with the exemption of light utility trucks from car-safety standards, rather than the establishment of those standards.

(B) people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklessly. This option is not essential to the argument, as it focuses on the driving behavior of individuals based on their motivations for purchasing automobiles, rather than the safety standards for light utility trucks.

(C) light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuries. This option does not directly relate to the argument's claim that drivers of light utility trucks are more likely to be injured. It introduces a general likelihood of accidents involving injuries without specifically addressing the exemption from safety standards.

(D) the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerful. This option introduces a different aspect regarding the power of the engines in light utility trucks. It is not directly relevant to the argument's claim about the likelihood of driver injury due to the exemption from car-safety standards.

(E) light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standards. This option aligns directly with the argument's claim and provides the necessary assumption. It establishes that light utility trucks are less likely to meet car-safety standards, which supports the conclusion that drivers of these trucks are more likely to be injured compared to drivers of cars subject to safety standards.

Therefore, the assumption on which the argument depends is (E) light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standards.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Over the past 50 years, expansive, low-density communities have proliferated at the edges of many cities in the United States and Canada, creating a phenomenon known as suburban sprawl. Andres (5) Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, a group of prominent town planners belonging to a movement called New Urbanism, contend that suburban sprawl contributes to the decline of civic life and civility. For reasons involving the flow of (10) automobile traffic, they note, zoning laws usually dictate that suburban homes, stores, businesses, and schools be built in separate areas, and this separation robs people of communal space where they can interact and get to know one another. It is as difficult (15) to imagine the concept of community without a town square or local pub, these town planners contend, as it is to imagine the concept of family independent of the home.Suburban housing subdivisions, Duany and his (20) colleagues add, usually contain homes identical not only in appearance but also in price, resulting in a de facto economic segregation of residential neighborhoods. Children growing up in these neighborhoods, whatever their economic (25) circumstances, are certain to be ill prepared for life in a diverse society. Moreover, because the widely separated suburban homes and businesses are connected only by “collector roads,” residents are forced to drive, often in heavy traffic, in order to (30) perform many daily tasks. Time that would in a town center involve social interaction within a physical public realm is now spent inside the automobile, where people cease to be community members and instead become motorists, competing for road space, (35) often acting antisocially. Pedestrians rarely act in this manner toward each other. Duany and his colleagues advocate development based on early-twentieth- century urban neighborhoods that mix housing of different prices and offer residents a “gratifying (40) public realm” that includes narrow, tree-lined streets, parks, corner grocery stores, cafes, small neighborhood schools, all within walking distance. This, they believe, would give people of diverse backgrounds and lifestyles an opportunity to interact (45) and thus develop mutual respect.Opponents of New Urbanism claim that migration to sprawling suburbs is an expression of people’s legitimate desire to secure the enjoyment and personal mobility provided by the automobile and the (50) lifestyle that it makes possible. However, the New Urbanists do not question people’s right to their own values; instead, they suggest that we should take a more critical view of these values and of the sprawl conducive zoning and subdivision policies that reflect (55) them. New Urbanists are fundamentally concerned with the long-term social costs of the now-prevailing attitude that individual mobility, consumption, and wealth should be valued absolutely, regardless of their impact on community life.The second paragraph most strongly supports the inference that the New Urbanists make which one of the following assumptions?

View answer

Automobile manufacturers defend their substitution of steel frames in cars with cheaper plastic components by claiming that consumer demand is ruled by a desire for light cars with crumple zones rather than as a result of corporate profit motives. However, if this trend were true, then carbon reinforced tubing, which is lighter than steel and stronger, would be available as an option. It is not.Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument against the automobile manufacturers claim?

View answer

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT

View answer

For every 100 automobile drivers who are involved in a collision due to brake failure, 1 will be seriously injured. A new safety feature exists that is nearly 100 percent successful in preventing collisions due to brake failure. Because the risk of serious injury from malfunction of the new safety feature is one out of 10,000, it is clearly safer for automobile drivers to have this new safety feature installed than not.Which of the following would it be most helpful to know in order to evaluate the argument?

View answer

Motorists in a certain country frequently complain that traffic congestion is much worse now than it was 20 years ago. No real measure of how much traffic congestion there was 20 years ago exists, but the motorists complaints are almost certainly unwarranted. The countrys highway capacity has tripled in the last twenty years, thanks to a vigorous highway construction program, whereas the number of automobiles registered in the country has increased by only 75 percent.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Light utility trucks have become popular among consumers who buy them primarily for the trucks’ rugged appearance. Yet although these trucks are tough-looking, they are exempt from the government’s car-safety standards that dictate minimum roof strength and minimum resistance to impact. Therefore, if involved in a serious high-impact accident, a driver of one of these trucks is more likely to be injured than is a driver of a car that is subject to these government standards.The argument depends on the assumption thata)the government has established safety standards for the construction of light utility trucksb)people who buy automobiles solely for their appearance are more likely than other people to drive recklesslyc)light utility trucks are more likely than other kinds of vehicles to be involved in accidents that result in injuriesd)the trucks’ rugged appearance is deceptive in that their engines are not especially powerfule)light utility trucks are less likely to meet the car-safety standards than are cars that are subject to the standardsCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam