X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > X: When a rare but serious industrial acciden...

Join the Discussion on the App

Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in people's sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.

Y's attempt to counter X's claim is best described by which of the following?

a)
It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.
b)
It makes apparent X's failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.
c)
It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.
d)
It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.
e)
It challenges X's assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond ...

Y's response challenges X's claim by shifting the focus from the statistical probability of future accidents to the utility or practicality of people's beliefs and actions in response to rare but serious industrial accidents. While X argues that the belief in an increasing frequency of accidents is irrational, Y presents an alternative perspective.

Y argues that the belief is rational because it serves a purpose: it creates a heightened sense of danger and prompts individuals to take precautionary measures to prevent similar accidents in the future. Y suggests that the belief, even if statistically unfounded, has a practical utility in terms of promoting safety precautions and reducing the likelihood of future accidents.

By shifting the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility, Y challenges the sole reliance on statistical probability and acknowledges the role of human perception, behavior, and proactive measures in response to rare events. Y's response highlights the importance of subjective experiences, individual responses, and the potential benefits of beliefs that prompt precautionary actions, even if they do not align with statistical probabilities.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

In the year 1898, the United States made its earliest plunge into imperialism. For the first time, the nation secured overseas lands, dominions too thickly populated to be adapted for the purposes of colonization. By earlier conquests and purchases such as those of Louisiana, Florida, Texas, California, and New Mexico, the United States had secured relatively empty territories, which a flow of emigrants from the Eastern States of the US could rapidly Americanize. But in Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Hawaii, there was never a serious attempt to colonize on the part of the American citizens. The reasons behind these conquests were similar to the ones that led to the European partition of Africa in the 19th century. The year 1898 indeed represented a strong shift in the foreign policy.Even though in the years after the Civil War (1861-1865), Denmark offered to sell St. Thomas and St. Johns cheaply, the United States refused to purchase them, and declined to annex San Domingo or to entertain Swedens proposal to purchase its West Indian territory. In 1893, instead of annexing Hawaii, the US attempted to bolster up the sovereignty of the native Queen. Then suddenly Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Guam were annexed; Hawaii was incorporated and Samoa was divided with Germany. America finally abandoned isolationism for good.In part, this change in foreign policy was due to military considerations. The possession of Hawaii, Panama and Guantanamo in Cuba was obviously necessary for the defense of Americas coasts. Just as the Monroe Doctrine was intended to protect the country from the approach of great military powers, so these new acquisitions were desired to pre-empt close-lying bases, from which fleets in enemy possession could assail the countrys trade or cut off its communication. Such strategic considerations, however, do not explain the whole of the new imperialistic policy. Economic motives played a greater part. As a result of the Industrial Revolution, merchants had begun to think in terms of foreign markets and the US financiers in terms of foreign investments. The growing population had made increasing demands upon food products, leaving less to be exported, and at the same time exports of manufactures had increased. Many citizens believed that the United States could not afford to adhere to a policy of isolation while other nations were reaching out for the command of new markets.Which of the following best describes the purpose of the third paragraph of the passage?

View answer

The sales of a product increases as the number of people who have used it increases.Sampling is a good method to increase the awareness of the products. Therefore, many energy drink manufacturers put stalls around each city they are targeting anddistribute free energy drinks as each flavor is launched. Such distribution increases the demand for the new flavor, forcing competitors to come up with a similar flavor of the energy drink and reducing the overall sales and profits of that flavors. Eventually energy drink manufacturers are forced to keep producing new flavors.In the argument above, the two portions play which of the following roles?

View answer

Directions: Each of these critical reasoning practice questions are based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given.Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white, mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings. Also noteworthy is that the moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.Q. In the given argument, what role do the boldfaced selections play?

View answer

Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?

View answer

Alan: Industrialization helps in achieving a variety of social objectives such as employment, gender equality and poverty eradication. Thus, extensive industrialization must be promoted for the welfare of a nation.Charlie: But you must also take into consideration that extensive industrial processes can have negative environmental impacts such as climate change, loss of natural resources and extinction of species. These threaten the economic and social welfare of a nation. Thus, a nation should promote the positive impacts of industrial development while limiting or eliminating its negative impacts.Charlie objects to Alans argument by

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases ones chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in peoples sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.Ys attempt to counter Xs claim is best described by which of the following?a)It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.b)It makes apparent Xs failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.c)It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.d)It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.e)It challenges Xs assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam