1.As it required ant-defection2.Supreme court take elected candidate affidavit of it property and its pending criminal cases.3.Supreme court take income tax return from candidate and make mandatory of internal election in their party.all these thing is not easy to do .

Reforming politics through legal means can indeed be a challenging task. Politics is a complex and multifaceted system that involves various stakeholders, interests, and power dynamics. Therefore, any attempt to bring about meaningful change through legal channels faces numerous obstacles and limitations.



a. Political Parties: Political parties play a significant role in the political system, and they often prioritize their own agendas over comprehensive reform efforts. They may resist changes that could threaten their power or disrupt the status quo.

b. Lobbying and Special Interests: Powerful interest groups and lobbyists exert influence in the political arena. They can sway decision-making by providing financial support to politicians, thereby hindering reform efforts that may challenge their interests.

c. Electoral System: The design of electoral systems can sometimes favor incumbents or larger parties, making it difficult for new or smaller groups to gain representation. This can limit the diversity of political voices and impede reform-minded candidates from entering the system.



a. Self-Preservation: Established political elites may resist reforms that could potentially diminish their power or privileges. They may engage in tactics such as gerrymandering, manipulating public opinion, or obstructing legislative processes to maintain their influence.

b. Partisan Polarization: In many political systems, deep-rooted partisan divisions hinder cooperation and compromise. Reforms often require bipartisan support, making it challenging to pass meaningful legislation if parties prioritize political gains over the common good.



a. Short-Term Focus: Politicians often prioritize short-term goals, such as winning elections or satisfying immediate demands, rather than long-term structural changes. This can deter them from investing political capital in complex and time-consuming reform processes.

b. Risk Aversion: Political leaders may be hesitant to propose or support reforms that carry risks or uncertainties. They may fear backlash from powerful interest groups, populist opposition, or negative impacts on their electoral prospects.



a. Low Voter Turnout: When citizens are disengaged or disillusioned with politics, voter turnout decreases. This can perpetuate the status quo and discourage politicians from pursuing ambitious reforms that might not resonate with a disenchanted electorate.

b. Lack of Trust: Widespread distrust in political institutions and politicians can undermine reform efforts. When people perceive the system as corrupt or unresponsive, they may be less inclined to participate or support legal avenues for change.



Reforming politics through legal means is undoubtedly a challenging endeavor due to structural barriers, resistance from political elites, a lack of political will, and public apathy. However, it is important to recognize that while legal channels may have limitations, they can still serve as a crucial starting point for initiating change. By raising awareness, mobilizing grassroots movements, and advocating for reform-minded candidates, it is possible to gradually overcome these obstacles and bring about meaningful political transformation.