What was the major issue discussed in the S.R. Bommai case (1994)?a)Re...
The major issue discussed in the S.R. Bommai case (1994) was the scope of Article 356 and the misuse of President's Rule in Indian states.
View all questions of this test
What was the major issue discussed in the S.R. Bommai case (1994)?a)Re...
Scope of Article 356 and the misuse of President's Rule
The major issue discussed in the S.R. Bommai case (1994) was the scope of Article 356 of the Indian Constitution and the misuse of President's Rule by the central government.
Background:
- The case arose from the dismissal of the state government of Karnataka by the central government under Article 356.
- The Governor had recommended the imposition of President's Rule citing breakdown of law and order in the state, which was contested by the state government.
Key Points of Discussion:
- The Supreme Court examined the limits of the power of the central government to impose President's Rule in a state.
- It emphasized that Article 356 should only be used as a last resort when the constitutional machinery in a state has completely broken down.
- The court also laid down guidelines to prevent the misuse of Article 356, such as requiring the central government to provide valid reasons for imposing President's Rule.
Significance:
- The S.R. Bommai case set important precedents regarding the use of Article 356, ensuring that it is not misused for political purposes.
- It strengthened the principles of federalism and the autonomy of state governments in India.
In conclusion, the S.R. Bommai case was a landmark judgment that clarified the scope of Article 356 and prevented its misuse, thereby upholding the principles of democracy and federalism in the country.