Which princely state faced a situation where a plebiscite was organize...
Junagarh, a princely state with a Muslim ruler and a Hindu-majority population, faced an intense situation. India organized a plebiscite, which ultimately led to the integration of Junagarh into India.
View all questions of this test
Which princely state faced a situation where a plebiscite was organize...
Introduction
The princely state that faced a plebiscite to determine its future integration with India was Junagarh. This historic event is significant in understanding the dynamics of state integration post-independence.
Background of Junagarh
- Junagarh was a princely state in Gujarat, ruled by a Muslim Nawab, Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III.
- After India gained independence in 1947, princely states were given the option to join either India or Pakistan.
Plebiscite Decision
- The Nawab of Junagarh initially chose to accede to Pakistan, despite the majority Hindu population.
- This decision was met with resistance from the local population, leading to widespread unrest and protests.
Role of India
- The Indian government intervened, arguing that the accession to Pakistan was not representative of the will of the people.
- To resolve the issue, a plebiscite was proposed, allowing the citizens of Junagarh to express their preference regarding accession.
Outcome
- The plebiscite, held in February 1948, resulted in overwhelming support for joining India.
- Consequently, Junagarh was integrated into India, and the Nawab fled, relinquishing control.
Significance
- The Junagarh plebiscite is a crucial example of how popular sentiment influenced the integration of princely states into the Indian Union.
- It highlighted the complexities of communal identities and political affiliations in the post-colonial context.
In summary, Junagarh's plebiscite was pivotal in shaping the political landscape of newly independent India, illustrating the intricate relationship between governance and public opinion during that time.