Question Description
The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.a)Comparing the attributes of nationalism with those of globalism in an analytical wayb)Shunning simplified interpretations by not comparing one global phenomenon with anotherc)Analysing the systemic qualities that have been newly acquired by some transformational phenomenond)Sorting the relevant content structure for the issues that need immediate attentionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.