CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   The world has entered the new Axial Age. Num... Start Learning for Free
The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.
Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?
  • a)
    The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.
  • b)
    Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.
  • c)
    Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are...
Option (a) is correct as it relates tim e to the inevitable relevance of reality for everyone.
All other options are incorrect as they offer different versions of a literal interpretation of the phrase.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. Which of the following best encapsulates the notion that the author is trying to convey by means of the multiple questions that are mentioned in the passage?

The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What can be inferred when the author says that the future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it?

The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. Which of the following problem-solution pair, who be most closely related to the "ghosts of the past" section of the passage?

Globalisation and the development of new legal forms and regimes during the past half century have gone hand-in-hand. The term “globalisation”, and even its existence, is contested. However, globalisation is not new, it cannot be reduced merely to market integration, still less to the neo-liberal political and economic project of free trade and open markets, and its ultimate destination is unknown, depending as much on politics and power as economics. Here, it is taken here to mean ‘a process (or set of processes) which embodies a transformation in the spatial organization of social relations and transactions – assessed in terms of their extensity, intensity, velocity and impact – generating transcontinental or interregional flows and networks of activity, interaction, and the exercise of power.Among the main shaping factors has been the tremendous growth of multinational companies and international production networks, new technology, changes in the nature and form of work, and the rise of new actors on the international scene. Associated with this transformation have been numerous legal changes, both on a transnational scale and within countries.The early years of the 21 century witness a startling variety of new legal forms and regimes which sometimes differ substantially in nature, content, scale and operation from the largely state-based system of governance of the past several centuries. A multiplicity of other sites of governance complement, supplements, or compete with the State, hence the term ‘governance’ instead of ‘government.While sometimes eroded or even reconfigured, the State remains powerful, if not predominant, with the relative strength of different institutions, norms and dispute resolution processes depending frequently on the specific context.While globalisation thus raises a number of challenges for thinking about law, the sheer volume of published work makes a comprehensive survey impossible here. Mainly we are concerned with the legal effects of economic globalisation, while recognizing that globalisation is not simply economic, and that many aspects of globalisation have implications for law. It focuses primarily on work within the broad fields of sociology of law, international relations and political economy of law, as these are the main disciplinary touchstones of writing on law and globalization. Human rights or law and development are not discussed in detail, because they are dealt with in.Q.Which of the following, if true, most undermines the authors view point about the interdependence of law and globalization.

Top Courses for CLAT

The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The world has entered the new Axial Age. Numerous transformations are taking place in the models of social, economic, and political activity, in projections of power and authority. The political landscape and its relevant "content structures" like democracy and liberalism, right and left, globalisation and nationalism etc, are acquiring new systemic qualities. If we want to avoid fighting with the ghosts of the past, it is necessary not only to take into account these transformations but examine them from within. To see the complexity of things, to understand the transformation of the world in transit, we need to get rid of myopic, linear interpretations of seemingly familiar but morphing notions like "globalism and nationalism". Who can manage the complexity of the "plurilateral" world we are stepping into? What kind of political architecture will be needed to support the nascent multi- or rather "pluripolarity"? How can we synchronise governance with inevitable digitalisation of politics? How can we enable decision-making mechanisms at the global level? These questions need to be answered. Nobody will miss the train to "a bright tomorrow". Historical time flows for everyone-you cannot hide "behind the wall" to avoid it. No actor of a historical process can bury his head in the sand of the comfortable present, indulging in "counter-clockwise revolt". The future will come for everyone, but not everyone will hold an equal place in it.Q. What does the author mean by, "Historical time flows for everyone"?a)The facts of changes and events in time are relevant to everyone and no one can avoid it. (b) Time is not relative to the experiences of an individual in the long run.b)Time is unaffected by individual pursuits.c)Time does not stop for anyone, and that has been proven historically.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev