UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  About democracy democratic countriesundemocra... Start Learning for Free
About democracy
democratic countries
undemocratic contries
difference between democratic and un democratic country
eg democratic country and un democratic country and why?
Most Upvoted Answer
About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference b...
Democratic Countries:
- In democratic countries, power is vested in the hands of the people, who exercise their authority through elected representatives.
- These countries uphold the principles of political equality, freedom of speech, press, and assembly, as well as the rule of law.
- Democratic countries ensure regular free and fair elections, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights and liberties.

Undemocratic Countries:
- Undemocratic countries are characterized by centralized power in the hands of a single leader or a small group of individuals.
- These countries often restrict political freedoms, suppress opposition, and violate human rights.
- Undemocratic regimes may use tactics such as censorship, propaganda, and intimidation to maintain control over the population.

Difference between Democratic and Undemocratic Countries:
- The key difference lies in the distribution of power and the extent of political freedoms and rights enjoyed by the citizens.
- In democratic countries, power is decentralized and shared among different branches of government, while undemocratic countries concentrate power in the hands of a few.
- Democratic countries prioritize the protection of individual liberties and rights, while undemocratic countries prioritize the maintenance of control and authority.

Democratic Country vs. Undemocratic Country and Why:
- Democratic countries like India, the United States, and Germany prioritize the participation of citizens in decision-making processes and uphold the rule of law.
- Undemocratic countries like North Korea, China, and Saudi Arabia suppress dissent, restrict freedoms, and prioritize the interests of the ruling elite over those of the general population.
- The choice between democracy and autocracy ultimately comes down to the values and priorities of a society, with democratic systems generally fostering greater accountability, transparency, and respect for human rights.
Community Answer
About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference b...
About Hitler from his death to birth
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Directions for the following 8 (eight) items: Read the following four passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.Passage -1The subject of democracy has become severely muddled because of the way the rhetoric surrounding it has been used in recent years, There is, increasingly, an oddly confused dichotomy between those who want to impose democracy on countries In the non-Western world (in these countries own interest, of cours e) and those who are opposed to such imposition (because of the respect for the countries own ways). But the entire language of imposition, used by both sides, is extraordinarily inappropriate since it makes the implicit assumption that democracy belongsexclusively to the West, taking it to be a quintessentially Western idea which has originated and flourished only in the West.But the thesis and the pessimism it generates about the possibility of democratic practice in the world would be extremely hard to justify. There were several experiments in local democracy in ancient India. Indeed, in understanding the roots of democracy in the world, we have to take an interest in the history of people participation and public reasoning in different parts of the world. We have to look beyond thinking of democracy only in terms of European and American evolution. We would fail to understand the pervasive demands for participatory living, on which Aristotle spoke with far-reaching insight, if we take democracy to be a kind of a specialized cultural product of the West.It cannot, of course, be doubted that the institutional structure of the contemporary practice of democracy is largely the product of European and American experience over the last few centuries. This is extremely important to recognize since these developments in institutional formats were immensely innovative and ultimately effective. There can be little doubt that there is a major Western achievement here.Q.Which of the following is closest to the view of democracy as mentioned in the above passage?

Passage -1The subject of democracy has become severely muddled because of the way the rhetoric surrounding it has been used in recent years, There is, increasingly, an oddly confused dichotomy between those who want to impose democracy on countries In the non-Western world (in these countries own interest, of cours e) and those who are opposed to such imposition (because of the respect for the countries own ways). But the entire language of imposition, used by both sides, is extraordinarily inappropriate since it makes the implicit assumption that democracy belongsexclusively to the West, taking it to be a quintessentially Western idea which has originated and flourished only in the West.But the thesis and the pessimism it generates about the possibility of democratic practice in the world would be extremely hard to justify. There were several experiments in local democracy in ancient India. Indeed, in understanding the roots of democracy in the world, we have to take an interest in the history of people participation and public reasoning in different parts of the world. We have to look beyond thinking of democracy only in terms of European and American evolution. We would fail to understand the pervasive demands for participatory living, on which Aristotle spoke with far-reaching insight, if we take democracy to be a kind of a specialized cultural product of the West.It cannot, of course, be doubted that the institutional structure of the contemporary practice of democracy is largely the product of European and American experience over the last few centuries. This is extremely important to recognize since these developments in institutional formats were immensely innovative and ultimately effective. There can be little doubt that there is a major Western achievement here.Q.With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Many of the non-Western countries are unable to have democracy because they take democracy to be a specialized cultural product of the West.2. Western countries are always trying to impose democracy on non-Western countries.Which of the above is/are valid assumption/assumptions?

PASSAGE IIMost champions of democracy have been rather reticent in suggesting that democracy would itself promote development and enhancement of social welfare they have tended to see them as good but distinctly separate and largely independent goals. The detractors of democracy, on the other hand, seemed to have been quite willing to express their diagnosis of what they see as serious tensions between democracy and development. The theorists of the practical spirit - Make up your mind: do you want democracy, or instead, do you want development?- often came ,at least to start with , from East Asian countries, and their voice grew in influence as several of these countries were immensely successful through the 1970s and 1980s and even later in promoting economic growth without pursuing democracy.To deal with these issues we have to pay particular attention to both the content of what can be called development and to the interpretation of democracy (in particular to the respective roles of voting and of public reasoning). The assessment of development cannot be divorced from the lives that people can lead and the real freedom that they enjoy. Development can scarcely be seen merely in terms of enhancement of inanimate objects of convenience, such as a rise in the GNP (or in personal incomes), or industrialisation important as they may be as means to the real ends. Their value must depend on what they do to the lives and freedom of the people involved, which must be central to the idea of development.If development is understood in a broader way, with a focus on human lives, then it becomes immediately clear that the relation between development and democracy has to be seen partly in terms of their constitutive connection, rather than only through their external links. Even though the question has often been asked whether political freedom is conductive to development, we must not miss the crucial that political liberties and democratic rights are among the constitutive components of development does not have to be established indirectly through their contribution to the growth of GNP.Q. According to the passage, why is a serious tension perceived between democracy and development by the detractors of democracy?

Top Courses for UPSC

About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why?
Question Description
About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why?.
Solutions for About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why?, a detailed solution for About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? has been provided alongside types of About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice About democracy democratic countriesundemocratic contries difference between democratic and un democratic countryeg democratic country and un democratic country and why? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev