UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following statements regarding t...
Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:
1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.
2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.
3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)1 and 3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supre...
Overview of the Statements
The three statements provided relate to significant judgments of the Supreme Court of India that have shaped the interpretation of the Constitution and fundamental rights.
1. Maneka Gandhi Case
- The Maneka Gandhi case (1978) is pivotal as it broadened the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
- The Supreme Court ruled that the right to life is not merely a physical existence but encompasses the right to live with dignity.
- This decision emphasized that any law that restricts this right must also adhere to the principles of natural justice and must not be arbitrary.
2. Keshavananda Bharati Case
- The Keshavananda Bharati case (1973) is known for the introduction of the 'basic structure' doctrine.
- The Supreme Court held that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution.
- This ruling is critical in maintaining the balance of power between the legislature and the Constitution.
3. Golak Nath Case
- The Golak Nath judgment (1967) established that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights, thereby asserting the supremacy of these rights.
- It was a landmark ruling that set the stage for subsequent debates and decisions regarding the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution.
Conclusion
All three statements are correct as they reflect key judicial interpretations that have significantly impacted the constitutional law landscape in India. Thus, the correct answer is option 'D', which encompasses all the statements.
The three statements provided relate to significant judgments of the Supreme Court of India that have shaped the interpretation of the Constitution and fundamental rights.
1. Maneka Gandhi Case
- The Maneka Gandhi case (1978) is pivotal as it broadened the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
- The Supreme Court ruled that the right to life is not merely a physical existence but encompasses the right to live with dignity.
- This decision emphasized that any law that restricts this right must also adhere to the principles of natural justice and must not be arbitrary.
2. Keshavananda Bharati Case
- The Keshavananda Bharati case (1973) is known for the introduction of the 'basic structure' doctrine.
- The Supreme Court held that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution.
- This ruling is critical in maintaining the balance of power between the legislature and the Constitution.
3. Golak Nath Case
- The Golak Nath judgment (1967) established that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights, thereby asserting the supremacy of these rights.
- It was a landmark ruling that set the stage for subsequent debates and decisions regarding the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution.
Conclusion
All three statements are correct as they reflect key judicial interpretations that have significantly impacted the constitutional law landscape in India. Thus, the correct answer is option 'D', which encompasses all the statements.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supre...
All three statements accurately describe significant rulings and interpretations by the Supreme Court of India that have shaped its role in upholding democracy and personal liberties:
1. The Maneka Gandhi Case (1978): This landmark judgment expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The court ruled that this right cannot be restricted except according to the procedure established by law, which must be fair, just, and reasonable. This case marked a significant shift towards broader interpretations of fundamental rights.
2. The Keshavananda Bharati Case (1973): This case is renowned for introducing the 'basic structure' doctrine, which holds that while Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure. This doctrine acts as a safeguard against any arbitrary amendments that could undermine the core principles of the Constitution.
3. The Golak Nath Judgment (1967): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that Parliament could not amend the Constitution in a way that would abridge or take away fundamental rights. This judgment emphasized the inviolability of fundamental rights and asserted the judiciary's role in protecting them.
Thus, all three statements are correct, making Option D the correct answer.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Supreme Court of India:1. The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.2. The Keshavananda Bharati case introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine.3. The Golak Nath judgment asserted that Parliament could not abridge Fundamental Rights.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup