UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Ju...
Start Learning for Free
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement
1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights
2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine
3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balanced
1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights
2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine
3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balanced
Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
- a)1 and 2 only
- b)2 only
- c)1 and 3 only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad...
The correct answer is option 'D' - 1, 2, and 3. Let's understand each pair in detail:
a) Shankari Prasad case: Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights
In the Shankari Prasad case (1951), the Supreme Court held that the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution under Article 368 includes the power to amend or abridge any of the Fundamental Rights. This case established the principle that the Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights.
b) Keshavananda Bharti case: Evolution of Basic structure doctrine
In the Keshavananda Bharti case (1973), the Supreme Court introduced the concept of the 'Basic structure doctrine'. The case was a landmark judgment that limited the amending power of the Parliament. It held that while the Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot destroy or damage its basic structure. The basic structure doctrine ensures that certain fundamental features of the Constitution, such as the supremacy of the Constitution, separation of powers, federalism, etc., cannot be amended or abrogated by the Parliament.
c) Minerva Mills case: Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balanced
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of balancing Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy. It held that both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are equally important and should be harmoniously interpreted to achieve the goals of social and economic justice. The court ruled that any law enacted by the Parliament that infringes upon the basic structure of the Constitution or violates the essential features of the Constitution would be declared unconstitutional.
In summary, the Shankari Prasad case established the Parliament's power to amend or abridge Fundamental Rights, the Keshavananda Bharti case introduced the concept of the basic structure doctrine, and the Minerva Mills case emphasized the need to balance Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles. Therefore, the correct pairs are 1, 2, and 3 (option D).
a) Shankari Prasad case: Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights
In the Shankari Prasad case (1951), the Supreme Court held that the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution under Article 368 includes the power to amend or abridge any of the Fundamental Rights. This case established the principle that the Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights.
b) Keshavananda Bharti case: Evolution of Basic structure doctrine
In the Keshavananda Bharti case (1973), the Supreme Court introduced the concept of the 'Basic structure doctrine'. The case was a landmark judgment that limited the amending power of the Parliament. It held that while the Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot destroy or damage its basic structure. The basic structure doctrine ensures that certain fundamental features of the Constitution, such as the supremacy of the Constitution, separation of powers, federalism, etc., cannot be amended or abrogated by the Parliament.
c) Minerva Mills case: Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balanced
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of balancing Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy. It held that both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are equally important and should be harmoniously interpreted to achieve the goals of social and economic justice. The court ruled that any law enacted by the Parliament that infringes upon the basic structure of the Constitution or violates the essential features of the Constitution would be declared unconstitutional.
In summary, the Shankari Prasad case established the Parliament's power to amend or abridge Fundamental Rights, the Keshavananda Bharti case introduced the concept of the basic structure doctrine, and the Minerva Mills case emphasized the need to balance Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles. Therefore, the correct pairs are 1, 2, and 3 (option D).
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following pairs: Case Outcome/Judgement1. Shankari Prasad case : Parliament can abridge any of the Fundamental Rights2. Keshvanand Bharti Case : Evolution of Basic structure doctrine3. Minerva Mills Case : Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles should be balancedWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup