CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligat... Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.
FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.
  • a)
    Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.
  • b)
    Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.
  • c)
    Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.
  • d)
    None of the above. 
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable ca...
Remoteness of damage is inversely proportional to the amount of compensation and here Krishna is unable to see this consequences that is why laxmi is not entitled to compensation.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable ca...
Remoteness of damage is inversely propor
tional to the amount of compensation and here Krishna is unable to see this consequences that is why laxmi is not entitled to compensation.
Free Test
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable ca...
Because he can't foresee lakshmi suffering from nervous shock he is only liable for cyclist accident
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour. The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act.FACTS: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in a crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages.a)Krishnan will be liable, because he owed a duty of reasonable care to everybody on the road including Lakshmi.b)Krishnan will not be liable, because he could not have foreseen Lakshmi suffering from nervous shock as a result of his act.c)Krishnan will be liable to Lakshmi because he failed to drive carefully.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev