S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earths force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > S1:A force of exists between everybody in the...

S₁:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.

P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.

Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.

R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.

S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.

S₆:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.

The Proper sequence should be:

a)
PRQS
b)
PRSQ
c)
QSRP
d)
QSPR

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it ...

Ans.

It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton. This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved. Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable. Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Verbal courses

Most Upvoted Answer

S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it ...

The correct sequence is option 'D': QSPR.

Explanation:

The given sentences are about the gravitational force, which is the force of attraction between two bodies due to their masses. The sequence should logically connect all the sentences to form a coherent paragraph.

Q: It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton - This sentence introduces the topic of the gravitational force and its history of investigation.

S: A force exists between everybody in the universe - This sentence introduces the concept of the gravitational force, which exists between all bodies in the universe.

P: Normally it is very small but when one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable - This sentence explains that the force of gravity is usually weak but becomes significant when one of the bodies is a planet like earth.

R: Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth - This sentence explains the effect of gravity on everything on or near the surface of the earth.

S6: The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity - This sentence defines the force of attraction between two bodies due to their masses as gravity.

Therefore, the proper sequence of the given sentences is QSPR.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chief: to make a good plan for his army and to keep a strong reserve. Both of these are also obligatory for the painter. To make a plan, thorough reconnaissance of the country where the battle is to be fought is needed. Its fields, its mountains, its rivers, its bridges, its trees, its flowers, its atmosphereall require and repay attentive observation from a special point of view.I think this is one of the chief delights that have come to me through painting. No doubt many people who are lovers of art have acquired it to a high degree without actually practicing. But I expect that nothing will make one observe more quickly or more thoroughly than having to face the difficulty of representing the thing observed. And mind you, if you do observe accurately and with refinement, and if you do record what you have seen with tolerable correspondence, the result follows on the canvas with startling obedience.But in order to make his plan, the General must not only reconnoitre the battle-ground; he must also study the achievements of the great Captains of the past. He must bring the observations he has collected in the field into comparison with the treatment of similar incidents by famous chiefs.Considering this fact, the galleries of Europe take on a newand to me at least a severely practical interest. You see the difficulty that baffled you yesterday; and you see how easily it has been overcome by a great or even by a skilful painter. Not only is your observation of Nature sensibly improved and developed, but also your comprehension of the masterpieces of art.But it is in the use and withholding of their reserves that the great commanders have generally excelled. After all, when once the last reserve has been thrown in, the commanders part is played. If that does not win the battle, he has nothing else to give. Everything must be left to luck and to the fighting troops. But these last reserves, in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or planand consequently without effect. Mere masses count no more. The largest brush, the brightest colours cannot even make an impression. The pictorial battlefield becomes a sea of mud mercifully veiled by the fog of war. Even though the General plunges in himself and emerges bespattered, as he sometimes does, he will not retrieve the day. In painting, the reserves consist in Proportion or Relation. And it is here that the art of the painter marches along the road which is traversed by all the greatest harmonies in thought. At one side of the palette there is white, at the other black; and neither is ever used neat. Between these two rigid limits all the action must lie, all the power required must be generated. Black and white themselves placed in juxtaposition make no great impression; and yet they are the most that you can do in pure contrast. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q. Which of the following assertions would most strengthen the authors claim that deterrence will not work on corporations?

View answer

It has been established thatP :Einstein wasQ :although a great scientistR :weak in arithmeticS :right from his school daysThe Proper sequence should be

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a company‘s aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the company‘s practice organize a highly effective boycott of the company‘s products, their moral views will soon enter into the company‘s deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly. If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q. If a company that produced shampoo products opted to stop the routine testing of its products on animals because it decided that it is wrong to cause the animals pain, what effect would this have on the argument made in the passage?

View answer

S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice S1:A force of exists between everybody in the universe.P :Normally it is very small but when the one of the bodies is a planet, like earth, the force is considerable.Q :It has been investigated by many scientists including Galileo and Newton.R :Everything on or near the surface of the earth is attracted by the mass of earth.S :This gravitational force depends on the mass of the bodies involved.S6:The greater the mass, the greater is the earth's force of attraction on it. We can call this force of attraction gravity.The Proper sequence should be:a)PRQSb)PRSQc)QSRPd)QSPRCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam