Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  He has no money now ......a)although he was v... Start Learning for Free
He has no money now ......
  • a)
    although he was very poor once
  • b)
    as he has given up all his wealth
  • c)
    because he was very rich once
  • d)
    because he has received huge donation
  • e)
    because he was very greedy about wealth
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has ...
Contradict the given part of the sentence, and sentence (e) also does not suit well. Thus, the correct sentence would be ” he has no money now although, he was very poor once.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Verbal courses
Most Upvoted Answer
He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has ...
Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B' - as he has given up all his wealth.

Reasoning:
Here's a detailed explanation of why option 'B' is the correct answer:

1. Context of the sentence:
The sentence states that "He has no money now." This implies that the person being referred to currently lacks any financial resources.

2. Contradictory options:
Among the given options, the only one that contradicts the current situation is option 'B' - as he has given up all his wealth. This option suggests that the person deliberately renounced or abandoned their wealth, leading to their current state of having no money.

3. Eliminating incorrect options:
Let's analyze the other options to understand why they are incorrect:

a) Although he was very poor once: This option suggests that the person was poor in the past, but it doesn't explain why they have no money now. It doesn't provide a logical connection to the current situation.

c) Because he was very rich once: This option implies that the person had significant wealth in the past, but it doesn't explain why they have no money now. It also lacks a logical connection to the current situation.

d) Because he has received a huge donation: This option suggests that the person received a substantial amount of money as a donation. However, since there is no mention of a donation in the sentence, it cannot be assumed as a valid reason for the person having no money now.

e) Because he was very greedy about wealth: This option suggests that the person's greed for wealth may have caused them to lose all their money. However, the sentence does not provide any information about their behavior or motivations, making this option speculative.

Conclusion:
Based on the given sentence, the most logical and supported answer is option 'B' - as he has given up all his wealth. This option aligns with the statement and provides a direct reason for the person's current lack of money.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Historians agree that those seeking public office in modern America make far fewer speeches in the course of their campaign than those seeking a public position in ancient Greece did. The author would most likely explain this by pointing out that

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2024 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice He has no money now ......a)although he was very poor onceb)as he has given up all his wealthc)because he was very rich onced)because he has received huge donatione)because he was very greedy about wealthCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev