Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody’s possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had not title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goodsb)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong beliefc)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.