With reference to regionalism, consider the following statements:1. Re...
Regionalism is not necessarily bad. Not all forms of regionalism are against national unity or nationalism. Regionalism can and has existed within the larger framework of nationalism. In this respect, regionalism has helped various regions put their demands before the central leadership. Regionalism is very much conducive to the idea of federalism. Both are helpful in governing large and diverse countries like India. However, at times regionalism has taken forms of secessionism, which goes against national unity. Similarly, at times it has also given rise to hatred among ethnic groups which disturbs national unity and harmony.
View all questions of this test
With reference to regionalism, consider the following statements:1. Re...
Regionalism and its relation to nationalism and federalism
Regionalism refers to the strong sense of identification and loyalty towards a particular region or a sub-national group within a larger nation-state. It is characterized by the belief that the interests, culture, and aspirations of a particular region should be given priority over national or central interests. In the context of regionalism, the given statements can be analyzed as follows:
Statement 1: Regionalism is a disintegrating force unlike nationalism which is a unifying force.
This statement is not entirely correct. While nationalism aims at creating a sense of unity and solidarity among people within a nation, regionalism does not necessarily have to be disintegrating. Regionalism can be seen as a natural outcome of cultural, linguistic, historical, or economic diversity within a country. It is a way for people to assert their unique identities and protect their interests while still being a part of the larger national fabric.
Regionalism can also foster a sense of pride and belonging among people, leading to a stronger national identity. For example, in India, regionalism coexists with nationalism, allowing diverse cultural practices and traditions to flourish within the larger Indian identity. Therefore, it would be incorrect to categorize regionalism as a purely disintegrating force.
Statement 2: Regionalism is not conducive with the idea of federalism.
This statement is also not entirely correct. Federalism is a system of governance that allows for the devolution of power between the central government and regional or state governments. It recognizes the importance of regional diversity and allows for the accommodation of regional aspirations and interests.
Regionalism can actually be complementary to federalism as it provides a platform for regional voices to be heard and addressed within the federal structure. It allows for greater participation and decentralization of power, ensuring that decision-making processes are inclusive and representative of regional perspectives.
In fact, regionalism can play a crucial role in strengthening federalism by ensuring that power is not concentrated solely in the hands of the central government. It helps in maintaining a balance between the national and regional interests, promoting a more inclusive and cooperative governance system.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both statements are incorrect. Regionalism is not necessarily a disintegrating force and can coexist with nationalism, allowing for diverse identities within a nation. Similarly, regionalism can be conducive to federalism by providing a platform for regional aspirations and facilitating inclusive governance.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.