Question Description
Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle - Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort. However, actual damage without violation of a legal right does not give rise to tortious liability.Facts – Ayush has a shop that offers printing, Xerox, and book binding services. In the shop, he also sells notebooks, stationery, printing inks, paper and other such items. He has a big board outside his shop displaying all the things he deals in, and this board is instrumental in attracting customers, who would otherwise be unaware that he sold such things. His shop is situated in a narrow street with several other stores. Rajesh owns a book store next to him, and he installs a display shelf with all the titles he sells, outside his shop in order to woo customers. This shelf obscures the view to Ayush‘s board, and there is a decrease in the number of customers who buy from him. Ayush decides to sue Rajesh and claim damages.a)Ayush can get damages, as he has suffered damage. The display shelf of Rajesh obscured the view of Ayush‘s board, and Rajesh had no right to do that.b)Ayush can claim damages, but it is up to the court to grant them, as the loss suffered is not so substantial. The shelf did not entirely block the view to the board.c)Ayush cannot claim damages in this case, as his legal rights have not been violated by Rajesh in setting up a display shelf.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.