CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Each question below is followed b... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strong
Give answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.
Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.
Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.
Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong
​Q.
Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?
Arguments:
I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.
II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.  
  • a)
     if only argument I is strong
  • b)
     if only argument II is strong.
  • c)
     if either argument I or II is strong.
  • d)
     if neither argument I nor II is strong.
  • e)
     if both arguments I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered ...
Answer will be E because both the statements are true
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: You have been given some passages followed by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the most appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.Expressing concern over the seriousness of the prevalence of the horrific social evil of child pornography, the Jairam Ramesh Committee has recommended important amendments to the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 besides technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiatives to address the alarming issue of pornography on social media and its effects on children and the society as a whole. The 40 recommendations made by the Adhoc Committee relate to adoption of a broader definition of child pornography,controlling access for children to such content, containing generation and dissemination of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), making accountable the Internet Service Providers and online platforms for denying access to children and removing such obscene content from online sites besides monitoring, detection and removal of content, preventing under-age use of such content, enabling parents for early detection of accessing such content by children, enabling effective action by the governments and authorized agencies to take necessary preventive and penal measures etc.Noting that the purveyors of child pornography seem always to be one step ahead of the regulators, the Committee stressed on the need for implementation of its recommendations as an integrated package of measures and not piecemeal to have any value and impact. The Committee urged the Prime Minister to take up the subject of child pornography and the measures required to combat it in one of his forthcoming Man Ki Baat broadcast besides taking the lead in building up a global political alliance to combat child pornography on social media like the International Solar Alliance initiative. The Committee has broadly sought to address two main issues viz., access of children to pornographic material on social media and circulation of pornographic material on social media in which children are abused.Currently, neither Section 67 of the IT Act nor Section 293 of the Indian Penal Code define child pornography. Its definition derived from what constitutes pornography, which is defined as "any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interests or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read and hear the same." Therefore, Law enforcement agencies should be able to break end-to- end encryption to hunt down distributors of child pornography online, Committee has urged as the nation looks to regulate social media.A man is said to commit "rape" who has sexual intercourse with woman against her will. Lax was madly in love with Shi. Shi loved Joy. Joy loved Aparna and Aparna loved Lax. Lax confessed his love to Shi but she rejected with disdain. Lax couldnt bear this. He decided to teach Shi a lesson. In order to take revenge he kidnapped her took her to a secluded place and disrobed her entirely. He video-taped the entire act in his camera and said he would put it on internet. Shi apologizes and promises to marry him if he lets her go.Lax declines and puts the clip on internet. Decide.

Direction: You have been given some passages followed by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the most appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.Expressing concern over the seriousness of the prevalence of the horrific social evil of child pornography, the Jairam Ramesh Committee has recommended important amendments to the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 besides technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiatives to address the alarming issue of pornography on social media and its effects on children and the society as a whole. The 40 recommendations made by the Adhoc Committee relate to adoption of a broader definition of child pornography,controlling access for children to such content, containing generation and dissemination of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), making accountable the Internet Service Providers and online platforms for denying access to children and removing such obscene content from online sites besides monitoring, detection and removal of content, preventing under-age use of such content, enabling parents for early detection of accessing such content by children, enabling effective action by the governments and authorized agencies to take necessary preventive and penal measures etc.Noting that the purveyors of child pornography seem always to be one step ahead of the regulators, the Committee stressed on the need for implementation of its recommendations as an integrated package of measures and not piecemeal to have any value and impact. The Committee urged the Prime Minister to take up the subject of child pornography and the measures required to combat it in one of his forthcoming Man Ki Baat broadcast besides taking the lead in building up a global political alliance to combat child pornography on social media like the International Solar Alliance initiative. The Committee has broadly sought to address two main issues viz., access of children to pornographic material on social media and circulation of pornographic material on social media in which children are abused.Currently, neither Section 67 of the IT Act nor Section 293 of the Indian Penal Code define child pornography. Its definition derived from what constitutes pornography, which is defined as "any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interests or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read and hear the same." Therefore, Law enforcement agencies should be able to break end-to- end encryption to hunt down distributors of child pornography online, Committee has urged as the nation looks to regulate social media.Union Government shall be empowered through its designated authority to block and/or prohibit all websites/intermediaries that carry child sexual abuse material. In such a situation, according to the author, should the Government be empowered?

Direction: You have been given some passages followed by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the most appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.Expressing concern over the seriousness of the prevalence of the horrific social evil of child pornography, the Jairam Ramesh Committee has recommended important amendments to the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 besides technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiatives to address the alarming issue of pornography on social media and its effects on children and the society as a whole. The 40 recommendations made by the Adhoc Committee relate to adoption of a broader definition of child pornography,controlling access for children to such content, containing generation and dissemination of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), making accountable the Internet Service Providers and online platforms for denying access to children and removing such obscene content from online sites besides monitoring, detection and removal of content, preventing under-age use of such content, enabling parents for early detection of accessing such content by children, enabling effective action by the governments and authorized agencies to take necessary preventive and penal measures etc.Noting that the purveyors of child pornography seem always to be one step ahead of the regulators, the Committee stressed on the need for implementation of its recommendations as an integrated package of measures and not piecemeal to have any value and impact. The Committee urged the Prime Minister to take up the subject of child pornography and the measures required to combat it in one of his forthcoming Man Ki Baat broadcast besides taking the lead in building up a global political alliance to combat child pornography on social media like the International Solar Alliance initiative. The Committee has broadly sought to address two main issues viz., access of children to pornographic material on social media and circulation of pornographic material on social media in which children are abused.Currently, neither Section 67 of the IT Act nor Section 293 of the Indian Penal Code define child pornography. Its definition derived from what constitutes pornography, which is defined as "any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interests or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read and hear the same." Therefore, Law enforcement agencies should be able to break end-to- end encryption to hunt down distributors of child pornography online, Committee has urged as the nation looks to regulate social media.Heinous crime alleged to have been committed by the offender is to be dealt with an iron hand. The victim girl, aged about 15 years, was alleged to have subjected to continuous sexual assault and video graphed for more than three years by no one else than her own father.Based on the inference drawn, what should be the authors stand on the punishment to be awarded to father?

Direction: You have been given some passages followed by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the most appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.Expressing concern over the seriousness of the prevalence of the horrific social evil of child pornography, the Jairam Ramesh Committee has recommended important amendments to the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 besides technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiatives to address the alarming issue of pornography on social media and its effects on children and the society as a whole. The 40 recommendations made by the Adhoc Committee relate to adoption of a broader definition of child pornography,controlling access for children to such content, containing generation and dissemination of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), making accountable the Internet Service Providers and online platforms for denying access to children and removing such obscene content from online sites besides monitoring, detection and removal of content, preventing under-age use of such content, enabling parents for early detection of accessing such content by children, enabling effective action by the governments and authorized agencies to take necessary preventive and penal measures etc.Noting that the purveyors of child pornography seem always to be one step ahead of the regulators, the Committee stressed on the need for implementation of its recommendations as an integrated package of measures and not piecemeal to have any value and impact. The Committee urged the Prime Minister to take up the subject of child pornography and the measures required to combat it in one of his forthcoming Man Ki Baat broadcast besides taking the lead in building up a global political alliance to combat child pornography on social media like the International Solar Alliance initiative. The Committee has broadly sought to address two main issues viz., access of children to pornographic material on social media and circulation of pornographic material on social media in which children are abused.Currently, neither Section 67 of the IT Act nor Section 293 of the Indian Penal Code define child pornography. Its definition derived from what constitutes pornography, which is defined as "any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interests or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read and hear the same." Therefore, Law enforcement agencies should be able to break end-to- end encryption to hunt down distributors of child pornography online, Committee has urged as the nation looks to regulate social media.A complaint was lodged with the Inspector of Police alleging that her daughter studying in 7th standard and other girl children were sexually abused by the Headmaster of the school. During enquiry it came to light that in the washrooms CCTV was installed. Based on the authors reasoning in the passage above, does the aforesaid case deserves judicial intervention?

Direction: You have been given some passages followed by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the most appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.Expressing concern over the seriousness of the prevalence of the horrific social evil of child pornography, the Jairam Ramesh Committee has recommended important amendments to the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 besides technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiatives to address the alarming issue of pornography on social media and its effects on children and the society as a whole. The 40 recommendations made by the Adhoc Committee relate to adoption of a broader definition of child pornography,controlling access for children to such content, containing generation and dissemination of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), making accountable the Internet Service Providers and online platforms for denying access to children and removing such obscene content from online sites besides monitoring, detection and removal of content, preventing under-age use of such content, enabling parents for early detection of accessing such content by children, enabling effective action by the governments and authorized agencies to take necessary preventive and penal measures etc.Noting that the purveyors of child pornography seem always to be one step ahead of the regulators, the Committee stressed on the need for implementation of its recommendations as an integrated package of measures and not piecemeal to have any value and impact. The Committee urged the Prime Minister to take up the subject of child pornography and the measures required to combat it in one of his forthcoming Man Ki Baat broadcast besides taking the lead in building up a global political alliance to combat child pornography on social media like the International Solar Alliance initiative. The Committee has broadly sought to address two main issues viz., access of children to pornographic material on social media and circulation of pornographic material on social media in which children are abused.Currently, neither Section 67 of the IT Act nor Section 293 of the Indian Penal Code define child pornography. Its definition derived from what constitutes pornography, which is defined as "any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interests or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read and hear the same." Therefore, Law enforcement agencies should be able to break end-to- end encryption to hunt down distributors of child pornography online, Committee has urged as the nation looks to regulate social media.Inspite of many penal laws and the recent POSCO Act, 2012 prescribing severe punishment for crimes against children, the number of such cases has increased.There are a few of the cases of abuse of children, ranging from 11 months to 10 years, reported in the Media. Based on the authors argument, which is the most plausible cause behind rising crimes against children?1. Collective failure of technological, institutional, social and educational measures and state level initiative.2. Lack of a broader definition of child pornography.3. Non-cooperation of Internet Service Provider with Law enforcement agencies in providing decryption keys.4. Existence of inefficient Police AdministrationChoose the most appropriate choices.

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Give answer (a) : if only argument I is strongGive answer (b) : if only argument II is strong.Give answer (c) : if either argument I or II is strong.Give answer (d) : if neither argument I nor II is strong.Give answer (e) : if both arguments I and II are strong​Q.Statement: Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, most of the children, particularly the teenagers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.II. No, denying access to the Internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information, instead the access may be controlled.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev