All Exams  >   BPSC (Bihar)  >   Indian Polity for State PSC Exams  >   All Questions

All questions of Fundamental Rights & Duties for BPSC (Bihar) Exam

Which of the following statements are correct regarding article 27?
1. It prohibits the state from favouring one religion over the another
2. The taxes can't be used for the promotion or maintenance of any one religion.
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
     1 Only
  • b)
     2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Anshika Sharma answered
Both of the given statements are correct regarding Article 27 of the Indian Constitution.
Article 27 of the Constitution of India states that no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.
Thus, the second statement is correct. Additionally, Article 27 also prohibits the State from favoring any particular religion or religious denomination by law or by financial aid, making the first statement also correct.

Which of the following elements apply to the Indian Constitution?
1. Absence of arbitrary power
2. Equality before law
3. Constitution is the result of the rights of the individual as defined and enforced by the courts of law
4. Constitution is the source of the individual rights
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 and 2 Only
  • b)
    1, 2 and 4 Only
  • c)
    1, 2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Nisha Menon answered
  • Absence of arbitrary power:
    • As previously noted, the Indian Constitution ensures the absence of arbitrary power through a system of checks and balances and the rule of law.
  • Equality before law:
    • Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws, confirming this principle applies to the Indian Constitution.
  • Constitution is the result of the rights of the individual as defined and enforced by the courts of law:
    • This statement suggests that the Constitution itself emerged from the judicial enforcement and definition of individual rights. This interpretation is somewhat problematic in the context of the Indian Constitution because the Constitution was drafted and adopted by the Constituent Assembly. It is a foundational document that outlines the rights of individuals, but it is not a result of pre-existing rights defined by courts. Instead, it establishes these rights.
  • Constitution is the source of the individual rights:
    • This is correct for the Indian Constitution, as it provides a comprehensive list of fundamental rights and mechanisms for their protection.
Given this, the statement that the "Constitution is the result of the rights of the individual as defined and enforced by the courts of law" does not accurately describe the Indian Constitution. The Indian Constitution itself is the source and origin of individual rights, rather than a product of pre-existing judicially enforced rights.
Correct Elements:
  1. Absence of arbitrary power
  2. Equality before law
  3. Constitution is the source of the individual rights
Therefore, the correct option remains:
 2.  1, 2 and 4 Only

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court ruled that Constitutional Amendments were also laws under Article 368 of the Constitution of India, which could be declared void for being inconsistent with Fundamental Rights?
  • a)
    Kesavananda Bharti Case 
  • b)
    Maneka Gandhi Case
  • c)
    Minerva Mills Case
  • d)
    none of 3
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Amit Sharma answered
Explanation: The Kesavananda Bharti case (1973) marked a significant event in the Indian constitutional history, as the Supreme Court ruled that Constitutional Amendments were also laws under Article 368 of the Constitution of India. The Court held that these amendments could be declared void if they were inconsistent with or violated the Fundamental Rights. This judgment established the doctrine of the "Basic Structure" of the Constitution, which means that Parliament cannot alter the basic features of the Constitution through amendments.

Which one among the following is not a Fundamental Right under the Constitution of India?
  • a)
    Right to equality
  • b)
    Right to freedom
  • c)
    Right to citizenship
  • d)
    Right against exploitation
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

According to Indian constitution there are six fundamental rights of Indian citizens which are right to equality, right to freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, right to freedom, right to constitutional remedies, and right against exploitation. Right to citizenship is not a fundamental right.

The Right to Education Act was actually implemented by the Government of India on
  • a)
    15th August, 2009
  • b)
    26th January, 2010
  • c)
    1st April, 2009
  • d)
    1st April, 2010
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Kajal Chopra answered
The Right to Education Act and its Implementation

The Right to Education Act, also known as the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, was implemented by the Government of India on 1st April, 2010. It is an important legislation that aims to provide free and compulsory education to all children between the ages of 6 to 14 years.

Background

- The implementation of the Right to Education Act was a significant step towards achieving universal education in India.
- The Act was enacted by the Parliament of India in 2009 and received Presidential assent on 26th August, 2009.
- It was modeled after the Article 21A of the Indian Constitution, which was inserted by the 86th Amendment Act in 2002, making education a fundamental right for children.

Key Provisions

- The Act provides for free and compulsory education to all children in the specified age group.
- It mandates that private schools must reserve 25% of their seats for children from economically weaker sections.
- The Act also establishes a system of neighborhood schools, ensuring that children can access education within a reasonable distance from their homes.
- It prohibits the practice of physical punishment or mental harassment of students.
- The Act also emphasizes the importance of quality education and the need for trained and qualified teachers.

Implementation Date

The implementation of the Right to Education Act took place on 1st April, 2010. This means that from this date onwards, all children in the specified age group were entitled to free and compulsory education. The Act was implemented in a phased manner, with different provisions being rolled out gradually over a period of time.

Impact of the Act

The implementation of the Right to Education Act has had a significant impact on the education landscape in India. It has helped in increasing enrollment rates and reducing dropout rates, particularly among marginalized and disadvantaged communities. The Act has also brought attention to the quality of education, leading to efforts to improve infrastructure, teacher training, and learning outcomes.

Overall, the Right to Education Act has played a crucial role in promoting inclusive and equitable education in India. It has helped in realizing the constitutional vision of providing education as a fundamental right to all children.

Article 19 of the Indian Constitution includes which of the following right?
  • a)
    Right to Constitutional Remedies
  • b)
    Right against exploitation
  • c)
    Right to freedom of speech and expression
  • d)
    Right to freedom of Religion
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Sameer Ghoshal answered
Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
The right to freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. It is considered a fundamental right and is essential for the functioning of a democratic society. This right allows individuals to express their opinions, thoughts, and ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation from the government.
Importance of Freedom of Speech and Expression
- Freedom of speech and expression is crucial for the exchange of ideas and information in a democratic society.
- It allows individuals to participate in public discourse, criticize the government, and hold those in power accountable.
- This right also plays a vital role in promoting creativity, innovation, and diversity of opinions.
Limitations of Freedom of Speech and Expression
- While the right to freedom of speech and expression is essential, there are certain limitations to this right.
- These limitations include restrictions on hate speech, incitement to violence, defamation, and obscenity.
- The government can impose reasonable restrictions on this right in the interest of public order, morality, and national security.
Role of the Judiciary
- The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the right to freedom of speech and expression.
- Courts have consistently upheld this right and struck down laws that infringe upon it.
- The judiciary acts as a watchdog to ensure that the government does not curtail this fundamental right unjustly.
In conclusion, the right to freedom of speech and expression is a cornerstone of democracy and is enshrined in Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. It is essential for the free exchange of ideas, public discourse, and holding those in power accountable.

In the Indian Constitution, as per Fundamental Rights, Abolition of Untouchability is a ________.
  • a)
    Right to equality
  • b)
    Right to freedom of religion
  • c)
    Right against exploitation
  • d)
    Right to Constitutional remedy
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Abolition of Untouchability as a Fundamental Right

The correct answer is option 'A' - Right to equality. The Indian Constitution guarantees several Fundamental Rights to its citizens, and one of them is the abolition of untouchability. This provision is enshrined under Article 17 of the Constitution.

Explanation:

1. Historical Context
- Untouchability refers to the social practice in India where certain castes and communities were considered inferior and treated as outcasts.
- This practice was deeply entrenched in Indian society for centuries, causing immense discrimination and oppression against those labeled as untouchables.
- The Constitution's framers recognized the urgent need to address this social evil and ensure equality for all citizens.

2. Right to Equality
- The right to equality is one of the fundamental pillars of the Indian Constitution. It ensures equal protection of laws for all individuals, irrespective of their caste, creed, religion, gender, or place of birth.
- Abolition of untouchability falls under the purview of the right to equality as it aims to eliminate discrimination based on caste.

3. Article 17 of the Constitution
- Article 17 explicitly states that "Untouchability is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden."
- This provision not only declares the abolition of untouchability but also prohibits its practice in any form.
- The inclusion of this article reflects the constitutional commitment to eradicating untouchability and promoting social justice.

4. Implementation and Protection
- The Indian Constitution provides for the enforcement and protection of Fundamental Rights.
- If any individual or community faces discrimination or violation of the right against untouchability, they can seek legal recourse through the courts.
- Article 32 of the Constitution grants the right to constitutional remedies, allowing individuals to approach the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of their Fundamental Rights.

Conclusion

The abolition of untouchability is an essential part of the right to equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution. It reflects the commitment of the framers to eradicate the social evil of untouchability and create a society based on equality, justice, and dignity for all. The inclusion of this provision is a significant step towards ensuring that every individual, regardless of their caste or community, is treated with respect and equality.

Which provision of the Fundamental Rights is directly related to the exploitation of children?
  • a)
    Article 17
  • b)
    Article 19
  • c)
    Article 23
  • d)
    Article 24
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Shraddha Basak answered
The provision of the Fundamental Rights that is directly related to the exploitation of children is Article 24. This article prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in any hazardous occupations or processes.

Explanation:
- Article 24 of the Indian Constitution states that "No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment."
- This provision recognizes the vulnerability of children and aims to protect them from exploitation and physical harm.
- The exploitation of children in hazardous occupations can have severe consequences on their health, well-being, and overall development.
- By explicitly stating that children below the age of 14 should not be employed in hazardous industries, Article 24 seeks to safeguard their rights and ensure their safety.
- This provision aligns with the principles of child rights and international conventions such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which India is a signatory to.
- The intent behind Article 24 is to protect children from engaging in work that could potentially harm their physical and mental development.
- It recognizes the importance of education and the need for children to have a safe and nurturing environment for their growth.
- The enforcement of Article 24 is crucial in preventing child labor and ensuring that children are not subjected to exploitative working conditions.
- Additionally, the Constitution provides for the Right to Education under Article 21A, which further reinforces the importance of providing children with access to education and preventing their exploitation through child labor.

In conclusion, Article 24 of the Indian Constitution directly addresses the issue of child exploitation by prohibiting the employment of children below the age of 14 in hazardous occupations. This provision aims to safeguard the rights and well-being of children and ensure their protection from exploitative working conditions.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Article 25 of the Indian Constitution guarantees individuals the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion.
Statement-II:
Article 26 of the Indian Constitution ensures that no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion of any particular religion.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?


Statement-I accurately reflects the content of Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which indeed guarantees individuals the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. This provision ensures the freedom of conscience and the ability to openly follow and share one's religious beliefs.
However, Statement-II inaccurately represents the content of the Constitution. Article 26 deals with the freedom to manage religious affairs, such as establishing and maintaining religious institutions, managing religious matters, and administering associated properties. It does not pertain to taxation issues related to the promotion of religions.
Hence, option (c) is the correct answer, as Statement-I is correct while Statement-II does not align with the provisions of Article 26.

In which of the following articles of Constitution, the Right to Equality are mentioned?
  • a)
    Articles 19 - 22
  • b)
    Articles 23 - 24
  • c)
    Articles 14 - 18
  • d)
    Articles 25 - 28
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Pallavi Iyer answered
The Right to Equality is an essential part of the Indian Constitution and is mentioned in Articles 14-18.

Article 14 - Right to Equality before the Law: This article ensures that all citizens are equal before the law and prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, gender, race, or place of birth.

Article 15 - Prohibition of Discrimination: This article prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It also empowers the state to make special provisions for women and children.

Article 16 - Equality of Opportunity: This article guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment and prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, race, sex, or place of birth.

Article 17 - Abolition of Untouchability: This article abolishes the practice of untouchability and makes it a punishable offence.

Article 18 - Abolition of Titles: This article prohibits the state from conferring any titles, except for military and academic distinctions.

These articles ensure that every citizen of India has equal rights and opportunities and prohibits discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, gender, race, or place of birth. The Right to Equality is a fundamental right that is essential for the growth and development of a democratic society.

Consider the following statements:
1. Article 17 of the Indian Constitution abolishes untouchability and makes its practice a punishable offense.
2. Article 16 allows for discrimination in public employment based on place of birth.
3. Article 15 allows the State to make special provisions for women and children.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 3 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

- Statement 1 is correct. Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes its practice a punishable offense.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Article 16 prohibits discrimination in public employment on several grounds, including place of birth, but allows exceptions for special provisions for certain classes.
- Statement 3 is correct. Article 15 allows the State to make special provisions for women and children, such as reservation of seats for women in local bodies or provision of free education for children.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Freedom of Association: Article 19(1)(c)
2. Freedom of Movement: Article 19(1)(d)
3. Freedom of Residence: Article 19(1)(e)
4. Freedom of Profession: Article 19(1)(f)
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

1. Freedom of Association: Article 19(1)(c) — Correct. This article guarantees the right to form associations or unions.
2. Freedom of Movement: Article 19(1)(d) — Correct. This article allows citizens to move freely throughout the territory of India.
3. Freedom of Residence: Article 19(1)(e) — Correct. This article provides the right to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India.
4. Freedom of Profession: Article 19(1)(f) — Incorrect. The correct article is Article 19(1)(g). Article 19(1)(f) provided the right to property, which was later repealed.
Three pairs are correctly matched.

How many articles come under 'Right to Equality'?
  • a)
    2
  • b)
    3
  • c)
    5
  • d)
    4
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

In the Right to Equality, there are five articles:

1. Article 14: Equality before the law - This article states that all individuals are equal before the law and have equal protection of the law. It prohibits any discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

2. Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination - This article prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It also allows the state to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes.

3. Article 16: Equality of opportunity in public employment - This article ensures equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of employment or appointment to any office under the State. It prohibits any discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, or residence.

4. Article 17: Abolition of untouchability - This article abolishes the practice of untouchability, which is a social evil based on caste discrimination. It declares untouchability as a punishable offense and prohibits its practice in any form.

5. Article 18: Abolition of titles - This article prohibits the conferment of any titles by the State. It states that no citizen can accept any title from a foreign state without the permission of the President.

These five articles together form the Right to Equality, which is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. These articles ensure that every citizen is treated equally before the law and has equal opportunities in various aspects of life, including employment, education, and social interactions.

By enforcing these articles, the Indian Constitution aims to eliminate discrimination and promote social justice and equality among all its citizens. The Right to Equality is a crucial aspect of a democratic and inclusive society, ensuring that every individual is treated with dignity and respect, irrespective of their background or identity.

Which one of the following categories of Fundamental Rights incorporates protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
  • a)
    Right against Exploitation
  • b)
    Right to Freedom
  • c)
    Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)
  • d)
    Right to Equality
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Nilesh Patel answered
  • Right to equality mentioned under Article 14-18 of the Indian Constitution.
  • Article 15 relates to the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
  • Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.
  • Article 17 abolishes untouchability. Hence Option 4 is Correct.
  • Article 18 abolishes the title.

The rule of equality before the law doesn't apply on:
  • a)
    President of India
  • b)
    Governor of States
  • c)
    Member of the Legislature
  • d)
    Both (a) and (b)
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Amit Kumar answered
  • Article 361 is an exception to Article 14 (Right to Equality) of the Indian Constitution.
  • Exceptions under Equality Before Law in the Indian Constitution
    • President or Governor of the state is not answerable to the court of law for exercising their executive powers.
    • No criminal proceeding against the President or Governor of state can be instituted or continued during their tenure in office.
    • No civil proceeding in which there is a claim of compensation can be instituted against the President or Governor of the state except after the expiry of 2-month notice issued against them.
    • No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President, or the Governor of a State, shall issue from any court during his term of office.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 21A - Right to Privacy
2. Article 22 - Protection against Arrest and Detention
3. Article 23 - Prohibition of Child Labour
4. Article 24 - Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explanation:

Correctly matched pairs:
1. Article 21A - Right to Privacy: This pair is correctly matched as Article 21A of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to privacy.
2. Article 22 - Protection against Arrest and Detention: This pair is also correctly matched as Article 22 provides protection against arrest and detention.

Incorrectly matched pairs:
3. Article 23 - Prohibition of Child Labour: This pair is not correctly matched as Article 24 of the Indian Constitution specifically deals with the prohibition of employment of children in factories.
4. Article 24 - Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories: This pair is incorrectly matched as Article 23 actually deals with the prohibition of child labour.
Therefore, only two pairs out of the four given are correctly matched.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Right to live with human dignity: Article 21
2. Right to free legal aid: Article 21
3. Right to freedom from noise pollution: Article 21
4. Right to property: Article 300A
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Tanishq Joshi answered
Analysis of the Pairs
To determine the correctness of the pairs, let's analyze each one concerning their respective articles in the Indian Constitution.
1. Right to live with human dignity: Article 21
- Article 21 states: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
- The Supreme Court has interpreted this right to include the right to live with human dignity.
2. Right to free legal aid: Article 21
- The right to free legal aid is also derived from Article 21.
- It ensures that individuals, especially those who cannot afford legal representation, receive legal assistance to ensure justice.
3. Right to freedom from noise pollution: Article 21
- The Supreme Court has extended the interpretation of Article 21 to include the right to a healthy environment.
- This includes the right to freedom from noise pollution, as it affects one's quality of life and dignity.
4. Right to property: Article 300A
- Article 300A states: "No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law."
- This article protects the right to property but does not relate to Article 21.
Conclusion
- The first three pairs are correctly matched as they are interpretations of Article 21.
- The fourth pair is not correctly matched as the right to property is specifically mentioned in Article 300A.
Final Count
- Therefore, only three pairs are correctly matched with respect to their articles.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C: Only three pairs.

Consider the following statements:
1. Retrospective criminal legislation implies that a person cannot be convicted for an act that was not an offense at the time it was committed.
2. The immunity against retrospective criminal legislation extends to preventive detention provisions.
3. Under double jeopardy, a person cannot be convicted for the same offense more than once.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

  • Statement 1 is correct. Retrospective criminal legislation, also known as ex-post facto criminal legislation, states that a person cannot be convicted for an act that was committed at a time when the act had not been declared by law as an offense.
  • Statement 2 is incorrect. The immunity against retrospective criminal legislation does not extend to provisions of preventive detention.
  • Statement 3 is correct. Double jeopardy means that a person cannot be convicted for the same offense more than once.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option C: 1 and 3 Only.

Which among the following countries was the earliest to give women the right to vote? 
  • a)
    France
  • b)
    USA
  • c)
    Australia
  • d)
    UK
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Earliest Country to Give Women the Right to Vote

Australia was the earliest country to give women the right to vote.

Background:

Women's suffrage was a long and hard-fought battle, spanning over several decades. Women's rights activists fought tirelessly for the right to vote, own property, and have equal rights as men. The movement gained momentum in the late 19th century, and several countries began granting women the right to vote.

Details:

1. Australia: In 1902, Australia became the first country to give women the right to vote in federal elections. This was a significant victory for the women's suffrage movement, and it paved the way for other countries to follow suit.

2. New Zealand: New Zealand followed closely behind, granting women the right to vote in 1893.

3. Finland: Finland was the first European country to give women the right to vote in 1906.

4. Norway: Norway granted women the right to vote in 1913.

5. United States: The United States granted women the right to vote in 1920. The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution granted women the right to vote after a long and hard-fought battle.

6. United Kingdom: The United Kingdom granted women the right to vote in 1918, but it was limited to women over 30 years of age. It wasn't until 1928 that women were granted the same voting rights as men.

Conclusion:

Australia was the earliest country to give women the right to vote, followed closely by New Zealand. The fight for women's suffrage was a long and hard-fought battle, but it paved the way for women's rights and equality around the world.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Retrospective criminal legislation: Article 20(1)
2. Double jeopardy: Article 20(2)
3. Prohibition against self-incrimination: Article 20(3)
4. Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: Article 21
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

1. Retrospective criminal legislation: Article 20(1) — Correct. This article prohibits ex-post facto criminal legislation.
2. Double jeopardy: Article 20(2) — Correct. This article states that no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
3. Prohibition against self-incrimination: Article 20(3) — Correct. This article ensures that no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.
4. Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: Article 21 — Correct. This article guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty.
All four pairs are correctly matched.

The 86th Constitution Amendment Act, 2002 inserted which of the following articles in the Constitution of India?
  • a)
    21-A
  • b)
    39-A
  • c)
    20-A
  • d)
    56-C
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Vijay Kumar answered
  • The 86th amendment to the constitution of India in 2002 provided
    • Right to Education as a Fundamental right in part -III of the constitution.
    • This amendment inserted Article -21A which made the right to education a fundamental right for children between ages 6-14 years. 

Consider the following statements:
1. Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
2. Article 16 provides for equal employment opportunities in State service for all citizens, with no exceptions.
3. Article 18 abolishes titles and prohibits the State from conferring any title except military or academic distinctions.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 3 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Rajat Reddy answered
Explanation:
There are three statements given regarding the provisions of the Indian Constitution. Let's analyze each statement individually to determine their correctness.

Statement 1:
Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This statement is correct as Article 15 ensures equality of all citizens and prohibits discrimination on specified grounds.

Statement 2:
Article 16 provides for equal employment opportunities in State service for all citizens, with no exceptions. This statement is incorrect. Article 16 does provide for equal employment opportunities, but it also allows for exceptions in certain cases such as reservations for socially and educationally backward classes.

Statement 3:
Article 18 abolishes titles and prohibits the State from conferring any title except military or academic distinctions. This statement is correct. Article 18 prohibits the State from conferring titles of nobility and abolishes titles except military and academic distinctions.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B as only statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Consider the following statements.
1. A remedy under Article 32 is in itself a Fundamental Right and hence, the Supreme Court may not refuse to exercise its writ jurisdiction
2. A remedy under Article 226 is discretionary and hence, a high court may refuse to exercise its writ jurisdiction
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Suresh Reddy answered
A remedy under Article 32 is in itself a Fundamental Right and hence, the Supreme Court may not refuse to exercise its writ jurisdiction. On the other hand, a remedy under Article 226 is discretionary and hence, a high court may refuse to exercise its writ jurisdiction. Article 32 does not merely confer power on the Supreme Court as Article 226 does on a high court to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights or other rights as part of its general jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court is thus constituted as a defender and guarantor of the fundamental rights.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Article 23 of the Indian Constitution prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labor.
Statement-II:
Article 23(1) prohibits traffic in human beings and forms of forced labor, while Article 23(2) provides for the prohibition of child labour.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    a. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    b. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    c. Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    d. Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?


Statement-I correctly identifies that Article 23 of the Indian Constitution prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labor. It addresses the prohibition of forms of exploitation like begar and bonded labor. However, Statement-II inaccurately describes the content of Article 23 by conflating its provisions. Article 23(1) specifically prohibits traffic in human beings and forms of forced labor, while Article 23(2) allows compulsory service for public purposes without discrimination based on specific factors.

Who was appointed as the Chairman of six-member Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) in 1966? 
  • a)
    Jawaharlal Nehru
  • b)
    H.C. Mathur 
  • c)
    V. Shankar 
  • d)
    Morarji Desai
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Rahul Mehta answered
A six-member Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) in 1966 under the chairmanship of Morarji Desai (followed by K Hanumanthayya) was appointed by Central Government. It was to the examine the various issues in Centre-state relations.

Consider the following statements:
1. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
2. Article 21 is applicable only to Indian citizens and not to foreigners.
3. The Supreme Court of India has described Article 21 as the 'heart of fundamental rights.'
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

  • Statement 1 is correct. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees two rights: the right to life and the right to personal liberty.
  • Statement 2 is incorrect. Article 21 is available to every person, including both Indian citizens and foreigners.
  • Statement 3 is correct. The Supreme Court of India has described Article 21 as the 'heart of fundamental rights.'
Therefore, the correct answer is Option C: 1 and 3 Only.

In which year Fundamental Duties were incorporated in our constitution?
  • a)
    In 1977
  • b)
    In 1978
  • c)
    In 1979
  • d)
    In 1976
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

The correct answer is option 'D', the Fundamental Duties were incorporated in the Indian Constitution in 1976.

The Fundamental Duties were added to the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976. This amendment was introduced by the Indira Gandhi-led government during the period of the Emergency. The amendment aimed to address the need for citizens to not only enjoy their rights but also fulfill their responsibilities towards the nation.

The Fundamental Duties are outlined in Article 51A of the Indian Constitution. They are a set of moral, ethical, and civic obligations that every citizen of India is expected to follow. These duties are not enforceable by law, but they serve as a guiding principle for citizens to contribute to the welfare of the country.

Below are the key points regarding the incorporation of Fundamental Duties in the Indian Constitution:

1. Background: The idea of including Fundamental Duties in the Constitution was first proposed by the Swaran Singh Committee in 1976. The committee recommended that these duties should be included to instill a sense of discipline, responsibility, and commitment among citizens towards the nation.

2. 42nd Amendment Act: The 42nd Amendment Act, also known as the "Mini Constitution," was passed in 1976. Along with several other changes, this amendment introduced the Fundamental Duties in Part IV-A of the Constitution.

3. Content of Fundamental Duties: The Fundamental Duties initially consisted of 10 duties. However, with subsequent amendments, the number has been increased to 11. Some of the key duties include respecting the national flag and the national anthem, promoting harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood, safeguarding public property, protecting the environment, and striving for excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity.

4. Significance: The inclusion of Fundamental Duties serves as a reminder to citizens that while enjoying their rights, they also have certain obligations towards the nation. It helps in promoting a sense of patriotism, social consciousness, and civic responsibility among individuals.

In conclusion, the Fundamental Duties were incorporated in the Indian Constitution in 1976 through the 42nd Amendment Act. These duties are intended to guide citizens in fulfilling their moral, ethical, and civic obligations towards the nation.

Consider the following statements.
1. The concept of martial law has been borrowed in India from the English common law
2. The expression ‘martial law' means the military rule and it has been defined in the Constitution
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Deepa Iyer answered
The concept of martial law has been borrowed in India from the English common law. However, the expression ‘martial law' has not been defined anywhere in the Constitution. It means “military rule'. It refers to a situation where civil administration is run by the military authorities according to their own rules and regulations framed outside the ordinary law. It thus implies the suspension of ordinary law and the government by military tribunals. It is different from military law that applies to the armed forces.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Article 27 of the Indian Constitution lays down that no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.
Statement-II:
Article 28 of the Indian Constitution permits educational institutions maintained by religious groups to disseminate religious instruction.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?


Statement-I correctly summarizes Article 27 of the Indian Constitution, which indeed specifies that no individual should be compelled to pay taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. This provision ensures the secular nature of the state.
However, Statement-II is incorrect. Article 28 of the Indian Constitution actually deals with the attendance of religious instruction in educational institutions. It states that no religious instruction shall be provided in State-run educational institutions, and individuals attending such institutions should not be compelled to partake in religious instruction or worship without their consent. Therefore, Statement-II inaccurately represents the content of Article 28.
This makes option (c) the correct answer, as Statement-I is accurate while Statement-II is not in alignment with the constitutional provision.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Article 30 of the Indian Constitution guarantees all religious and linguistic minorities the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
Statement-II:
Such institutions have the right to seek recognition for their levels and diplomas and aid wherein aid is given to  other education institution establishments supplying similar schooling on the premise of their excellence
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?


Both Statement-I and Statement-II accurately represent the provisions of the Indian Constitution. Statement-I correctly summarizes Article 30, which grants minorities the right to establish and manage educational institutions as per their preferences.
Statement-II accurately reflects Article 29, which safeguards the interests of minority groups by offering them the right to conserve their distinctive culture, language, and script. This provision aims to protect the cultural identity of minority communities within the Indian social fabric.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct choice as both statements are correct, with Statement-II explaining the essence of Statement-I.

Consider the following statements.
1. The 'Procedure established by law' gives wide scope to the Supreme Court to grant protection to the rights of its citizens
2. It can declare laws violative of these rights void not only on substantive grounds of being unlawful but also on procedural grounds of being unreasonable
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Suresh Reddy answered
The American Constitution provides for 'due process of law' against that of 'procedure established by law' which is contained in the Indian Constitution.
The difference between the two is : The 'Procedure established by law' gives wide scope to the Supreme Court to grant protection to the rights of its citizens.
It can declare laws violative of these rights void not only on substantive grounds of being unlawful but also on procedural grounds of being unreasonable.
Our Supreme Court, while determining the constitutionally of a law, however examines only the substantive question i.e whether the law is within the powers of the authority concerned or not. It is not expected to go into the question of its reasonableness, suitability or policy implications".
Hence, statement 2 is incorrect.

Consider the following statements:
1. Under Article 21, the right to life includes the right to live with human dignity.
2. The right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 years is covered under Article 21A, which was added by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002.
3. The right to fair trial is not included under the expanded interpretation of the right to life.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

K.L Institute answered
- Statement 1: Correct. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution includes the right to live with human dignity as interpreted by the Supreme Court.

- Statement 2: Correct. Article 21A, introduced by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002, provides the right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 years.

- Statement 3: Incorrect. The right to a fair trial is part of the expanded interpretation of Article 21, encompassing the right to life and personal liberty.

Thus, statements 1 and 2 are correct. The correct answer is B: 1 and 2 Only.

The writ of prohibition is not available against:
1. Quasi-judicial authority
2. Administrative authority
3. Legislative body
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 and 2 Only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

T.S Academy answered
The writ of prohibition is a judicial writ issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal, commanding it to cease proceedings in a case that is outside its jurisdiction. It is generally not available against administrative authorities or legislative bodies because:
  1. Quasi-judicial authorities: The writ of prohibition can be issued against quasi-judicial bodies when they act without jurisdiction or exceed their jurisdiction.
  2. Administrative authorities: The writ of prohibition is not typically issued against purely administrative actions, as they do not perform judicial or quasi-judicial functions.
  3. Legislative bodies: The writ of prohibition cannot be issued to legislative bodies since the judiciary does not have the authority to intervene in legislative functions.
Thus, the writ of prohibition is not available against administrative authority and legislative body, making option b the correct answer.

Which concept is an element of the concept of 'Rule of Law' as propounded by A.V. Dicey?
  • a)
    Absence of arbitrary power
  • b)
    Immunity of the President and Governors
  • c)
    Exception for Members of Parliament
  • d)
    Right to property
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

A key element of the concept of 'Rule of Law' according to A.V. Dicey is the absence of arbitrary power, which implies that no individual can be subjected to punishment except for a breach of law. This principle emphasizes the importance of legal accountability and the rule of law in a democratic society.

Chapter doubts & questions for Fundamental Rights & Duties - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Fundamental Rights & Duties - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses BPSC (Bihar)

Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!

Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev