---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > ---- a market economy will become effective, ...

---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.

a)
In the event that
b)
In view of
c)
In order that
d)
Otherwise
e)
But for

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should...

In order that a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should...

Explanation:
In this sentence, the phrase "In order that" is the correct choice for completing the sentence.

Market Economy:
A market economy is an economic system in which economic decisions and the pricing of goods and services are guided by the interactions of a country's individual citizens and businesses. In a market economy, the laws of supply and demand, rather than government intervention, determine the allocation of resources and the distribution of income.

Maximizing Benefits and Minimizing Risks:
To ensure that a market economy is effective, it is important to maximize its potential benefits and minimize its risks. This can be achieved through various measures and strategies.

In order that:
The phrase "In order that" is used to indicate purpose or intention. In the context of the sentence, it implies that certain actions or steps need to be taken to ensure that a market economy becomes effective and its benefits are maximized while the risks are minimized.

Completing the Sentence:
The sentence states that "a market economy will become effective." This implies that there are certain conditions or requirements that need to be met for this to happen. The phrase "In order that" is the most appropriate choice to introduce these conditions or requirements.

By using the phrase "In order that," the sentence can be completed as follows:

"In order that a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized."

This completion of the sentence conveys the idea that there are certain actions or measures that need to be taken to ensure the effectiveness of a market economy. These actions include maximizing the potential benefits and minimizing the risks associated with a market economy.

Overall, the phrase "In order that" is the correct choice in this sentence as it accurately conveys the purpose or intention of taking actions to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of a market economy.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a company‘s aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the company‘s practice organize a highly effective boycott of the company‘s products, their moral views will soon enter into the company‘s deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly. If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q. If a company that produced shampoo products opted to stop the routine testing of its products on animals because it decided that it is wrong to cause the animals pain, what effect would this have on the argument made in the passage?

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q. Which of the following assertions would most strengthen the authors claim that deterrence will not work on corporations?

View answer

Inst.Pick out the most effective word(s) from the given words to fill in the blank to make the sentence meaningfully complete.QMy uncle decided to take ...... and my sister to the market.

View answer

Inst.Pick out the most effective word(s) from the given words to fill in the blank to make the sentence meaningfully complete.QThe grapes are now ...... enough to be picked.

View answer

---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice ---- a market economy will become effective, potential benefits should be maximized and risks minimized.a)In the event thatb)In view ofc)In order thatd)Otherwisee)But forCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam