A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to...

A. Diseases when suffered by poor appear

B. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.

C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to die

D. off diseases than people who are rich.

a)
A only
b)
D only
c)
B and C
d)
C only

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when...

A is incorrect because an adjective if used as a noun must have the definite article—the poor. B is incorrect better o ff people needs f f in off. In D 'die off' is incorrect—die of diseases will be correct.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when...

Explanation:

The correct answer is option 'D' - C only.

Sentence A: "Diseases when suffered by poor appear" - This sentence is incorrect in terms of grammar and usage. It is missing a subject and a verb. The verb "appear" should be followed by a noun or pronoun as the subject, and it should be followed by a verb phrase to complete the sentence. Additionally, the word "appear" should be in the past tense to match the verb tense of the other sentences in the paragraph.

Sentence B: "to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people" - This sentence is incorrect in terms of grammar and usage. It is missing a subject and a verb. The verb "afflict" should be followed by a noun or pronoun as the subject, and it should be followed by a verb phrase to complete the sentence. Additionally, the phrase "better of people" is not grammatically correct. It should be "better-off people" to indicate people who are more financially well-off.

Sentence C: "The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to die" - This sentence is correct in terms of grammar and usage. It has a subject ("The less affluent") and a verb ("are"), and the word choice and punctuation are appropriate.

Sentence D: "off diseases than people who are rich" - This sentence is incorrect in terms of grammar and usage. It is missing a verb and a subject. The verb "die" is needed to complete the sentence, and it should be followed by a subject to indicate who is dying. Additionally, the phrase "off diseases" is not grammatically correct. It should be "from diseases" or "due to diseases" to indicate the cause of death.

Therefore, the correct sentences or parts of sentences in terms of grammar and usage are sentence C only: "The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to die."

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.If the author of the passage travelled to a political convention and saw various candidates speak he would most likely have the highest regard for an orator who

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

View answer

In the world today we make health and end in itself. We have forgotten that health is really means to enable a person to do his work and do it well. a lot of modern medicine and this includes many patients as well as many physicians pays very little attention to health but very much attention to those who imagine that they are ill. Our great concern with health is shown by the medical columns in newspapers. the health articles in popular magazines and the popularity of television programmes and all those books on medicine. We talk about health all the time. Yet for the most part the only result is more people with imaginary illness. The healthy man should not be wasting time talking about health: he should be using health for work. The work does the work that good health possible.Talking about the health all time makes people

View answer

S1:Palaeobotany is the study of fossil plants preserved in rocks dating back in millions of years.P :Records of the history of the world are contained in fossils.Q :Through the ages, plants have evolved from simple to more complex forms.R :First there were water plants then land plants appeared during the Paleozoic era.S :But since the fossil remains appear locked in rock layers, they are closely related to the geologist area of investigation.S6:The fossil plants indicate the age of the rock, and also point to facts regarding climate, temperature and topography.The Proper sequence should be

View answer

A. The world of luxury is innovating in ways which strike an emotional chord with the effluent buyer.B. And the elite are not complaining.C. Vishakha Doshi Director Marketing Communication Entrack distributors for Montblanc India says that people identify with the core values of such legends.D. Each of the limited edition luxury writing instrument pays tribute to icons and is a collectors pride.

View answer

A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A. Diseases when suffered by poor appearB. to be more deadly than when they afflict better of people.C. The less affluent, indeed, are more likely to dieD. off diseases than people who are rich.a)A onlyb)D onlyc)B and Cd)C onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam