Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small... Start Learning for Free
Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.
  • a)
    was sitting
  • b)
    sat
  • c)
    have been sitting
  • d)
    No improvement
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving ac...
Let’s examine the sentence: “Five years ago on this date, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.” The sentence mentions an event that happened five years ago. Hence, it would use the verbs of past tense. So, the verbs “am sitting” would become “was sitting” to correct the sentence. Hence, Option A is the correct answer.
 
Free Test
Community Answer
Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving ac...
Answer:
Verb Tense:
The sentence is referring to an action that occurred five years ago, so it requires the past tense.

Subject-Verb Agreement:
The subject of the sentence is "I," which is singular, so the verb must also be singular.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' (was sitting).

Explanation:
The sentence is in the past tense, which means that the verb must also be in the past tense. The options 'B' (sat) and 'C' (have been sitting) are both incorrect because they are not in the past tense. Option 'D' (No improvement) is incorrect because it does not change the verb tense or subject-verb agreement.

Option 'A' (was sitting) is the correct answer because it is in the past tense and agrees with the subject "I." The sentence describes an action that was happening at a specific point in the past, and the past continuous tense (was sitting) is the appropriate verb form to use in this case.

In summary, the correct answer is option 'A' (was sitting) because it is in the past tense and agrees with the singular subject "I."
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980s.The first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace.These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies. Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers. The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products.Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods.American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.The passage suggests that compared to Japanese workers, American workers are often considered

Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Five years ago today, I am sitting in a small Japanese car, driving across Poland towards Berlin.a)was sittingb)satc)have been sittingd)No improvementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev