Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  A. The debasement of currencies, particularly... Start Learning for Free
A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,
B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,
C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billion
D. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.
  • a)
    A and D
  • b)
    A and C
  • c)
    C and D
  • d)
    D only
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gol...
A must include the definite article before US dollar—the US dollar. B has two errors: 'perceived as a monetary unit" and it's vs its. C has two errors: since 1920's is incorrect, it should be corrected to since the 1920s—the is necessary and no apostrophe for the plural of years.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gol...
The correct answer is option 'D': D only

Explanation:
The passage discusses the factors that have given gold an advantage and are expected to lead to a rise in its price. Let's break down the given statements and analyze them.

A. The debasement of currencies, particularly the US dollar, has given gold a leg up.
- This statement suggests that the devaluation or weakening of currencies, especially the US dollar, has benefited gold. When currencies lose their value, investors often turn to gold as a safe haven investment, leading to an increase in its demand and price.

B. Gold is perceived as a monetary unit and is slated to record its tenth annual gain.
- This statement indicates that gold is seen as a form of currency and is expected to achieve its tenth consecutive year of price appreciation. The perception of gold as a store of value and a hedge against inflation has contributed to its increasing demand.

C. The US Federal Reserve is set to pump $600 billion through the purchase of debt.
- This statement highlights the monetary policy action of the US Federal Reserve, which involves injecting a significant amount of money ($600 billion) into the economy by purchasing government bonds or debt. This expansionary monetary policy is expected to increase the money supply and potentially lead to inflation.

D. More money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.
- This statement suggests that as a result of the US Federal Reserve's monetary policy action, there will be an increase in the amount of money available in the economy. This excess liquidity may flow into various investment avenues, including commodities like gold, driving up their prices.

Based on the given statements, option 'D' is the correct answer as it includes the statement D, which encompasses the expected impact of the US Federal Reserve's actions on commodities like gold. The other options do not include this statement or include statements that are not mentioned in the passage.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Historians agree that those seeking public office in modern America make far fewer speeches in the course of their campaign than those seeking a public position in ancient Greece did. The author would most likely explain this by pointing out that

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.If the author of the passage travelled to a political convention and saw various candidates speak he would most likely have the highest regard for an orator who

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a company‘s aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the company‘s practice organize a highly effective boycott of the company‘s products, their moral views will soon enter into the company‘s deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly. If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q. If a company that produced shampoo products opted to stop the routine testing of its products on animals because it decided that it is wrong to cause the animals pain, what effect would this have on the argument made in the passage?

A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A. The debasement of currencies, particularly US dollar, has given gold,B. perceived a monetary unit, a leg up with the metal slated to record it's tenth annual gain,C. the longest since 1920's. With the US Federal Reserve set to pump $600 billionD. through purchase of debt, more money is expected to chase commodities such as gold.a)A and Db)A and Cc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev