In the setup of the previous two questions, how is h related to n?a)h ...
Explanation:
To understand how h is related to n in the given setup, let's analyze the information provided in the previous two questions.
In the previous questions, we are given a setup where a certain value h is directly related to the value of l and n. The value of l is constant, while the value of n varies.
Now, let's consider the options provided:
a) h = 2n
- This option suggests that h is directly proportional to n, with a constant of proportionality equal to 2. However, this is not consistent with the information provided in the setup, as there is no mention of a constant factor of 2.
b) h = 17n
- This option suggests that h is directly proportional to n, with a constant of proportionality equal to 17. Again, this is not consistent with the given setup, as there is no mention of a constant factor of 17.
c) h = n
- This option suggests that h is directly proportional to n, with a constant of proportionality equal to 1. This is consistent with the information provided in the setup, where h is directly related to n without any constant factor.
d) h = l3n
- This option suggests that h is directly proportional to the product of l, 3, and n. However, there is no mention of a constant factor of 3 in the setup, so this option is not consistent with the given information.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C', which states that h is directly proportional to n without any constant factor.